Marcelo Alejandro Estigarribia (32 Viewers)

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
Had a poor game, but took care of Biabiany, basically blocking each other out, not bad considering how important the latter is for Parma, should take better care of posession though, lost a few too many balls. The real ones to blame are the ones in the middle, who're supposed to make things happen like Vucinic, Matri, to a lesser extent Marchisio and Vidal.
 

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
yea Biabany the new Messi, he was really gonna rape us wasn't he.

worst part was completely zero offense, especially in the first half...was as if he wasn't even on the pitch, Chi and even Marchi made more forward moves down the left flank than him.
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
Just needs a little coaching.

Tell him that instead of shooting to just to smash the ball low across the six-yard box whenever he's in a dangerous situation.

Shouldn't be that hard an adjustment to make.
 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
yea Biabany the new Messi, he was really gonna rape us wasn't he.
After Giovinco he's their second most effective and dangerous player in attack, if there was anything to stop, it was Gio and Biabiany. Don't get me wrong, Esti had a really poor game in attack, but he had the most decent opponent apart from Barzagli. Bonucci and Chiellini mostly had to deal with the joke of a striker Floccari, our MVP midfield couldn't make a difference against Morrone, Valiani and Mariga, Licht had a nobody against him and I won't talk about how frustrating were Matri and Vucinic, who couldn't trouble Pavarini (the new Buffon, really raped us, didn't he?).
 

Lapa

FLY, EAGLES FLY
Sep 29, 2008
20,044
Okay, finally I will say it out loud...Esti is a fucking piece of shit, we don't need him and especially we don't need players like him in our starting lineup. Some users have been praising him, for what? Please tell me. Everytime I see him getting the ball he loses it right away...if not, then he tries to dribble and loses it at that point. If he tries to cross, he loses the ball at that point. SO COULD SOMEBODY FUCKING TELL ME WHY SOME OF THE MEMBERS THINK THAT THIS GUY IS ANY GOOD?
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
Because he doesn't lose the ball anything like as much as you suggest.

I like his play up to the point when he has to chose between shooting and crossing, as he almost invariably chooses the wrong option.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 32)