Mafia: Vikings in Distress (17 Viewers)

[ALC]

Soren is acting extremely differently than last time. Last time he was actively seeking out Gs, analysing peoples behaviour and voting etc. This time it looks like he is deliberately keeping a low profile, not so much that he doesn't post, but that his posts are not notable

Yeah but so is Voller, so is Maddy. Maybe they just used up all their energy on that game and this one seems boring in comparison.

- - - Updated - - -

No point in voting Maddy if he'll be autolynched.

That's the point. We don't lose any more citizens and prolong the game by giving the Detective more time.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Völler]

Yeah but so is Voller, so is Maddy. Maybe they just used up all their energy on that game and this one seems boring in comparison.

I haven't used up all my energy. This game is just boring so far.

 

[radekas]

I agree with Matt about how everyone should stick together with the votes. The Gs want variety so they can have an influence on who gets lynched. This way, at least we take that away from them. We need to form some sort of coalition amongst everyone here where we agree on someone to lynch every day. Whoever betrays it or doesn't go along with the voting becomes the next victim. That's where the vigilante would be very useful. We wouldn't have to wait for them to be lynched, the vigilante could just whack them during the day. He gets two per day. If the vigilante would read this, pls take note of it.

Now as far as voting for someone today, I think it should be between players with very low vote counts that are already in danger of getting autolynched. Not only do we not risk losing unnecessary citizens, but we also give the detective more time to find the Gs. The three least active players?

Hoori and Lion with 9 and 8 posts respectively and Maddy with none.

Maddy.

The Gs only care about spreading votes if one of them is considered for lynching. When we pick a C early they won't give a fuck about who we lynch. They will just go with it and be happy to get rid of another 2 Cs on that day.

- - - Updated - - -

That's the point. We don't lose any more citizens and prolong the game by giving the Detective more time.

That actually is a good idea. We lose 2 instead of 3 Cs.

Maddy

 

[ALC]

I haven't used up all my energy. This game is just boring so far.

Yes, I also covered that as a possibility.

That actually is a good idea. We lose 2 instead of 3 Cs.

Maddy

Thank you.
@Quetzalcoatl whatchu think?

 

[IliveForJuve]

I haven't used up all my energy. This game is just boring so far.

But you weird Danes made it interesting so you'd better start posting moar.

 

[Fr3sh]

Holy shit Matt, you really don't like me don't you! I think you just mad I out lasted you last game with my magnificent play, regardless you shouldn't be seeking to lowering your numbers (I am assuming that you are a C, like I am) because of the way another game turn out to be. It's retarded and you are putting your team in a risk by loosing an extra C, so why not make an educated guess, or snoop around, ask to call up a Detective or something.

So by that logic, let me ask you this my friend, why are you insisting on the kill?

I think that whoever may be the detective should go out there and investigate this fool, then if the results are positive then we'll kill 'em. As for now I'm no rush to vote.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

I agree with Matt about how everyone should stick together with the votes. The Gs want variety so they can have an influence on who gets lynched. This way, at least we take that away from them.]

Exactly.

I dont agree about lynching players who will get auto-lynched anyway. That way the Gs would have no need to save anyone with their votes and we'd learn nothing

 

[IliveForJuve]

The D should PM me his investigation.

 

[radekas]

Exactly.

I dont agree about lynching players who will get auto-lynched anyway. That way the Gs would have no need to save anyone with their votes and we'd learn nothing

The chances of us lynching a G are small especially so early on. We just help Gs get rid of Cs unless we get extremely lucky and somehow pick a G.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Fresh I love ya

 

[radekas]

The D should PM me his investigation.

You are a potential recruit. There is no way the D should ever contact you.

 

[Fr3sh]

The D should PM me his investigation.

The set of balls on this guys

 

[Völler]

The D should PM me his investigation.

Shut the fuck up.

 

[IliveForJuve]

You are a potential recruit. There is no way the D should ever contact you.

The set of balls on this guys

Shut the fuck up.

 

[Völler]

Holy shit Matt, you really don't like me don't you! I think you just mad I out lasted you last game with my magnificent play, regardless you shouldn't be seeking to lowering your numbers (I am assuming that you are a C, like I am) because of the way another game turn out to be. It's retarded and you are putting your team in a risk by loosing an extra C, so why not make an educated guess, or snoop around, ask to call up a Detective or something.

So by that logic, let me ask you this my friend, why are you insisting on the kill?

I think that whoever may be the detective should go out there and investigate this fool, then if the results are positive then we'll kill 'em. As for now I'm no rush to vote.

You are trying way, way harder than in the last game.
Fr3sh

 

[Fred]

Yeah but so is Voller, so is Maddy. Maybe they just used up all their energy on that game and this one seems boring in comparison.

- - - Updated - - -



That's the point. We don't lose any more citizens and prolong the game by giving the Detective more time.

Ya voller too, maddy was banned.

I'd be damned if neither one of Voller or soren is a g,

 

[ALC]

Ya voller too, maddy was banned.

I'd be damned if neither one of Voller or soren is a g,

Maddy stopped being banned yesterday after the deadline. Still hasn't posted at all.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

The chances of us lynching a G are small especially so early on. We just help Gs get rid of Cs unless we get extremely lucky and somehow pick a G.

Yes, very unlikely. But even unlikelier is the D finding a G AND getting the others to lynch him without blowing his cover. There's no other way than to fish, in my humble opinion.

 

[Kate]

That actually is a good idea. We lose 2 instead of 3 Cs.

Maddy

Not a bad idea at all. If Maddy comes back and posts enough, we can switch to whoever else is doomed. Maddy

 

[Völler]

Not a bad idea at all. If Maddy comes back and posts enough, we can switch to whoever else is doomed. Maddy

You've been all over the forum today with your Jane Austen shit. Why haven't you posted here?

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, very unlikely. But even unlikelier is the D finding a G AND getting the others to lynch him without blowing his cover. There's no other way than to fish, in my humble opinion.

Agreed.