Just a strange voting pattern we should keep in mind. Would be a pretty noob move, especially considering the players involved, but still noteworthy.
It wasn't that strange if you try to analyze it.
14 minutes before deadline Kate posted the votes. Salvo had 5 votes, while Preet and Adonis had 4. All were in danger.
The first one who voted after that was Adonis. Strangely enough, instead of giving the 6th vote to Salvo, he gave the 5th vote to Preet. After that it was Salvo 5, Preet 5, Adonis 4.
I come next, 10 minutes before deadline. I vote Preet too and now it's Preet 6, Salvo 5, Adonis 4.
Then comes Sheik with an Adonis vote and makes it Preet 6, Adonis 5, Salvo 5.
Now each and every one of them is in a pretty bad position. One change of vote might mean being lynched.
Then comes the change. I change from Preet to Salvo and it becomes Salvo 6, Preet 5, Adonis 5. Was I trying to save Preet with this vote? Why did I put her in danger in first place then?
Then the seemingly decisive votes comes - Soren changes from Preet to Salvo and makes it Salvo 7, Adonis 5, Preet 4. Preet is save now, but Adonis isn't. In order to save his ass, he changes from Preet to Salvo too and makes it Salvo 8, Adonis 5, Preet 3
And then Soren makes another strange vote. He changes from Salvo to Adonis, putting Adonis back in danger because he makes it Salvo 7, Adonis 6, Preet 3. One more change from Salvo to Adonis and the guy is dead.
The voting was closed after this.
So tell me, except for Adonis trying to save his ass, who was trying to save anyone here?
- - - Updated - - -
Actually, if this voting pattern shows anything at all, it's that Soren was totally indifferent towards the three players who risked being lynched. He started the Preet voting some 15 minutes before deadline, he gave what would have been a decisive vote for Salvo, and then he changed again to Adonis and put the latter in huge danger to be lynched with a last second switch from Salvo to Adonis.
That's something that only a G who knew that all three were Cs would do, or a C who had no idea what are their roles.
It's hard to accept that a G would incriminate himself like that, so my opinion is that he's a C that didn't know their roles and didn't really care which one of them dies.