Mafia 2020 v2 || The FANATIC (16 Viewers)

[Klin]

Man this is gonna be a great game I'm sure.

How do we decide between Mr Chocolate and kingAle today, given that so far that is the only "thing" we can go with?

- - - Updated - - -

Your interaction with Alen is funny, you make basic sound posts about no lynch I agree with even if the no Intel gained from it makes semi-useless safety measure, understand what logic drives you even if it makes less sense (no we wouldn't be losing 3) in this scenario. But how you letting him semi verbally dominate you to the point you say you wouldn't vote back on him is funny. No matter how loud and domineering someone is, don't ever hesitate to back your word with a vote.

Even to the point where you risk losing the game.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Osman]

Indeed that's a terrible idea and anyone supporting it is suspicious to me.

It gives us very little read to do it too much and somewhat kills the following days hunches, but with what logic says someone pushing for no lynch to save Cs is the most suspicious to you?

You can say it's more meaningless too safe tactic when you need every info and general input you can get in huge game like this, but suspicious to prefer to play it safe? Dont follow.

 

[kappa96]

Your interaction with Alen is funny, you make basic sound posts about no lynch I agree with even if the no Intel gained from it makes semi-useless safety measure, understand what logic drives you even if it makes less sense (no we wouldn't be losing 3, only a trio of noob Gs would recruit tonight) in this scenario. But how you letting him semi verbally dominate you to the point you say you wouldn't vote back on him is funny. No matter how loud and domineering someone is, don't ever hesitate to back your word with a vote.

I don't see the point in voting for him.
I don't know if you read my posts for the begining. I said he is dangerous as a G' and very useful as a c.
I tend to go for a cautious way of doing things until we have more Intel.
If it comes between me and him I would obviously vote him. That's not the case ,yet.


Sent from my Mi 9T Pro using Tapatalk

 

[Osman]

First time. Why do you ask?

General curiosity. Because I missed couple mafia games here in the past, and I'm curious who has experience or played before amongst this games new ppl I havent played with before. In this game, you, Ronn and snobist.

 

[ALC]

How many people risk getting autolynched so far?

- - - Updated - - -

Nvm; it’s still early

 

[Völler]

Man this is gonna be a great game I'm sure.

How do we decide between Mr Chocolate and kingAle today, given that so far that is the only "thing" we can go with?

You're a G this time?

 

[Klin]

You're a G this time?

Unfortunately no. Would have whacked kingAle first to make Gordo mad.

 

[Völler]

Unfortunately no. Would have whacked kingAle first to make Gordo mad.

Unfortunately? As far as I remember you don't like being a G.

 

[Klin]

Unfortunately? As far as I remember you don't like being a G.

Nah I love it. It's less stressful for me.

 

[Osman]

Nah I love it. It's less stressful for me.

Lol how is it less stressful?

 

[Klin]

Lol how is it less stressful?

It's less stressful in terms of having to figure less stuff out. As a C you start out with 0 intel.

 

[ALC]

Let’s lynch somebody!

 

[kappa96]

Let’s lynch somebody!

Who do you propose and why?

Sent from my Mi 9T Pro using Tapatalk

 

[radekas]

It gives us very little read to do it too much and somewhat kills the following days hunches, but with what logic says someone pushing for no lynch to save Cs is the most suspicious to you?

You can say it's more meaningless too safe tactic when you need every info and general input you can get in huge game like this, but suspicious to prefer to play it safe? Dont follow.

By the logic of gaining absolutely nothing. Not a single C knows anything right now. Not lynching anyone gives us nothing. That's not playing it safe. That's playing it for the Gs. We lose someone to a whack, we don't learn anything about voting patterns and we have no chance to lynch a G (rare but can happen). Basically we are in the exact same place but with 1 less C. But you know all that already which means:

 

[piotrr]

Mr. Chocolate - king Ale, Radekas, Quetz
Snobist - Tomice, Ronn
No Lynch - Snobist, kappa96
king Ale - Völler
kappa96 - Mr Chocolate
Osman - ALC

campionesidd, Kyle, GordoDeCentral, Klin, Fr3sh, Osman and ILFJ are yet to vote.

--
Alen is in jail and his vote does not count.

 

[kappa96]

By the logic of gaining absolutely nothing. Not a single C knows anything right now. Not lynching anyone gives us nothing. That's not playing it safe. That's playing it for the Gs. We lose someone to a whack, we don't learn anything about voting patterns and we have no chance to lynch a G (rare but can happen). Basically we are in the exact same place but with 1 less C. But you know all that already which means:

But after the detective investigates we have more chances to get it right and less casualties if the lynching goes wrong.

Sent from my Mi 9T Pro using Tapatalk

 

[Osman]

By the logic of gaining absolutely nothing. Not a single C knows anything right now. Not lynching anyone gives us nothing. That's not playing it safe. That's playing it for the Gs. We lose someone to a whack, we don't learn anything about voting patterns and we have no chance to lynch a G (rare but can happen). But you know all that already which means:

Stop acting stupid unless you wanna make actual real lists. It gives you little info to go on, but saves a civilians life guranteed for a further day, so the D has extra time to give us info to go on with investigation etc. Its never been a tactic I like, said it enough, but you are completely on purpose twisting its purpose. There is NO WAY a G would like no lynch under any circumstances, its the last thing they would want, so anyone genuinely pushing for no lynch (and not just paying lipservice to it), is not more suspicious G candidate for it. The Gs wants us killing eachother off. especially first day when mainly ppl die based on nothing hunches. No lynch and being investigated is the nr 1 threat that faces them on first day.


Because its such a big game, I rather not we do it, but its basic to understand the logic behind it, playing it safe and playing the numbers game (especially in smaller games), which should be able to. The last you should ever say is no lynch is a G tactic.

- - - Updated - - -

It's less stressful in terms of having to figure less stuff out. As a C you start out with 0 intel.

See it as completely the opposite. As a G you have to be on guard 24/7 with every word to not be investigated (being lynched with no investigates is for noobs lol), cant naturally share your thought process and have to lie at all times, make empty posts that makes you a target etc. Also you are less confused then a C, but you still have to figure out the special roles that are a threat to you. Being a C is defenitely more carefree, you feel less threatend, can naturally share every thought process and clear yourself easily, and figuring out Gs and being confused isnt stressful, its the most fun part. Only stressful part is the fear of being whacked lol, especially early.

 

[campionesidd]

I’m gonna stick with my gut and go with
Snobist

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

I’m gonna stick with my gut and go with
Snobist

Yes, yes... spread those votes. Can't let Mr. Choco die, especially if he's a CC or the recruiter!

 

[Klin]

But after the detective investigates we have more chances to get it right and less casualties if the lynching goes wrong.

Sent from my Mi 9T Pro using Tapatalk

How do you propose the Detective to give us some hints on who we should go for?