Also this post by choco
mr chocolate : "Kyle hasnt been posting much, but to be fair he has said that we was not going to be that active before the game started, i think Osman has been unusually quiet for such an active player usually, he is 100% worthy of an investigation "
Mr chocolate speaks gordo's language who said this after the voting was done " gordo says : "Then we go with what you(matt) think and investigate one of osman or kyle
mr chocolate : "This is the situation, i don't think the voting patterns of the day 1 votes should be looked into too much as i am a C, 2 c's were in the firing line to get lynched, if the g's know that its between me or king Ale to go, and that we are both C's then i don't see a reason as to why they would pile on votes on a single person, infact spreading them out would be the better option to not make any patterns apparent when they are not necessary.
Some of the smarter G's may have wanted me gone in hopes of recruiting the much more experienced and active king Ale, conversely they might have wanted her gone because she is the better player." ------ in my opinion this means they are throwing shade at king Ale who was making sense along with osman in not lynching ALC
kyle could very well be a g'(voted snobist day 2) but osman's posts have nothing to suggest that he is one.
they can still both be c's ,but mr chocolate is, for me at least a proven g'
I might not be right but choco and gordo want to move the investigation onto osman.
He is probably a civilian and would waste a day investigating him