Are you defending X because you strongly believe that he's a C?
You're both defending X and you're both voting Maddy without a good reason. Yes, both are very possible even for Cs, but you two seem to think strangely alike in the last hour.
Are you defending X because you strongly believe that he's a C?
You're both defending X and you're both voting Maddy without a good reason. Yes, both are very possible even for Cs, but you two seem to think strangely alike in the last hour.
I strongly believe he's a C. My reason is that he was the earliest person to imply I am a G and people started to jump on me later. If I turned out to be a lynched C, X would make himself a major target on day 2. I don't think he would make such a mistake. He would rather leave other people to go for me.
Are you defending X because you strongly believe that he's a C?
You're both defending X and you're both voting Maddy without a good reason. Yes, both are very possible even for Cs, but you two seem to think strangely alike in the last hour.
I already said why I'm more leaning towards X as a C, I doubt that he'd done what he did as a G. Gonna keep an eye on him, but I definitely wouldn't lynch him on day one.
I strongly believe he's a C. My reason is that he was the earliest person to imply I am a G and people started to jump on me later. If I turned out to be a lynched C, X would make himself a major target on day 2. I don't think he would make such a mistake. He would rather leave other people to go for me.
Because I just don't see people jumping on X for giving the first vote to the lynched Radekas on day 1. There is always someone who gives the first vote to the lynched civilian in the opening day, and almost always it's another C. It's more about the last votes, not the first vote.
Because I just don't see people jumping on X for giving the first vote to the lynched Radekas on day 1. There is always someone who gives the first vote to the lynched civilian in the opening day, and almost always it's another C. It's more about the last votes, not the first vote.
It's not about first vote. It's about starting the bandwagon and following it. He was questioning me for a good few hours and we had quite a few exchanges. He didn't vote for me at all but he seemed like a major force pushing for me. It's not the same as randomly voting first imo.
X, Kyle and Maddy are all suspicious, but your bandwagon posts earlier today and lazy reasoning for voting radekas is suspicious to me. It's a really, really vague reason, but I'm voting you Jihadi John. But it's almost a shot in the dark, I admit.
What I find strange about X is that if it had been the second day, I'd have really thought he was the detective trying to let us know about his investigation result. I don't understand how he can be possibly detective certain on day 1. Again, why would he do that if he's a g? I can't seem to make sense of it.