Lukaku a̶n̶d̶ ̶K̶e̶s̶s̶i̶e̶ thread. (11 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
19,320
Chelsea decided against Vlahovic according to reports.
I guess it means its either Bayern or Tottenham now (Bayern because of their interest and Tottenham since Kane might go to Bayern and then they will need a replacement)

As for Lukaku - It seems on despite the Vlahovic affair. Hope it goes off.
 

Bianconero_Aus

Beppe Marotta Is My God
May 26, 2009
80,933
Romeo and another guru have said that Lukaku deal was never close. It was an idea but Chelsea didn't get close to the money we wanted to make a swap happen
I reckon Romeo is 100% spot on. I don’t think this transfer was anywhere near being a done deal at any stage. Just smelt like a move to fuck with Inter more than anything.

That’s not to say that we would still not sell Vlahovic, but nothing about this proposed deal made much sense to me sporting wise anyway. Goes completely against Giuntoli and the clubs new policy about sustainability.
 

Salvo

J
Moderator
Dec 17, 2007
62,790
I reckon Romeo is 100% spot on. I don’t think this transfer was anywhere near being a done deal at any stage. Just smelt like a move to fuck with Inter more than anything.

That’s not to say that we would still not sell Vlahovic, but nothing about this proposed deal made much sense to me sporting wise anyway. Goes completely against Giuntoli and the clubs new policy about sustainability.
I'd be more worried about Bayern missing out on Kane

Who else would they go for?
 

Bianconero_Aus

Beppe Marotta Is My God
May 26, 2009
80,933
Chelsea decided against Vlahovic according to reports.
I guess it means its either Bayern or Tottenham now (Bayern because of their interest and Tottenham since Kane might go to Bayern and then they will need a replacement)

As for Lukaku - It seems on despite the Vlahovic affair. Hope it goes off.
Lukaku to Spurs. Makes the most sense to me.
 

juventus4life

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2012
4,376
I reckon Romeo is 100% spot on. I don’t think this transfer was anywhere near being a done deal at any stage. Just smelt like a move to fuck with Inter more than anything.

That’s not to say that we would still not sell Vlahovic, but nothing about this proposed deal made much sense to me sporting wise anyway. Goes completely against Giuntoli and the clubs new policy about sustainability.
Agree. It makes no sense to me at all if we even have the crazy idea getting that big loser.
 

DelTrezeguet

Junior Member
Dec 9, 2017
52
It makes sense to Fartlegri, cause he has never been able to grow any young player to a better player or small player to bigger player ( Barzagli or anything ever close to that ) and with that pure fcuk Lkaku, he do not have to prove again that he has failed with youngster ( Vlaho. ) The single most deteriorating figure in Juventus is that fcuking smiley Allegri.
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,006
Chelsea don’t want Lukaku
Bayern don’t want Lukaku
Tottenham don’t want Lukaku
PSG dont want Lukaku
Aside from Lukaku, who nobody really wants in here as far as I know, why would we compare market goals from 4 teams with unlimited budgets (or in Tottenhams case at least huge for the striker position) to one that has to fill a hole in the budget?

:think:

#vlahovicresta
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)