looking for someone with a bakground in law (7 Viewers)

[Lawnchair Bes]

anybody in here will to help a fellow juventino?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Martin]

pado? fli?

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

fli really? cool

pado would be too advanced for what i need. and no i dont mean fli is not advanced, just that its the first time im hearing this

 

[Geof]

I'm a law student. Can I offer my help?

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

i am sure this would not reqire much of your time and by all means i do understand if you do not have time.

i have this case
http://canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2006/2006scc41.html

and these questions to answer

[FONT=&quot](c) [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Which courts heard this case before it went to the Supreme Court? [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot](d) [/FONT][FONT=&quot]What was the jurisdiction issue before the Supreme Court?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] How did the court decide this issue? What were its reasons? [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot](e) [/FONT][FONT=&quot]What was theratio decidendi in this case?[/FONT]


the marking scheme seems to suggest that they do not require very thorough answers


thank you in advance

 

[Geof]

I'm not familiar with Canadian Law, but this doesn't seem very though. A good reading would do the trick Besmir.


EDIT. Oh wait. Look at IV. it lists the Courts below:
Federal Court
Federal Court of Appeal.

......

A very quick read tells me that: The issue was the jurisdiction of the Federal Court. The question is if this case is one of maritime law (as it involves a boat) or provincial law.
Maritime law is a competence of the federal court, where Provincial Law is not.

Basically the court said it is provincial law, and thus declares that the Federal court hadn't jurisdiction to rule the case. So, the appeal is allowed.

I'm in a rush now, if you want I could take a look at it later.
Good luck.

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

i know that of course. just tired and cant seem to concentrate

 

[swag]

Well, DB, I'm glad to hear that you didn't get busted for public urination. However, I'm worried that you may have spent too much time near bungee cords while lounging on the deck of a boat in your lawnchair.

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

try sitting in my 97 plymouth neon looking over the 2007 cadilac lineup

 

[Slagathor]

I only studied International Law, Human Rights, that sort of thing. If you could use my help you'd be in serious trouble.

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

I'm not familiar with Canadian Law, but this doesn't seem very though. A good reading would do the trick Besmir.


EDIT. Oh wait. Look at IV. it lists the Courts below:
Federal Court
Federal Court of Appeal.

......

A very quick read tells me that: The issue was the jurisdiction of the Federal Court. The question is if this case is one of maritime law (as it involves a boat) or provincial law.
Maritime law is a competence of the federal court, where Provincial Law is not.

Basically the court said it is provincial law, and thus declares that the Federal court hadn't jurisdiction to rule the case. So, the appeal is allowed.

I'm in a rush now, if you want I could take a look at it later.
Good luck.

i just saw this :faq1: i came to those conclusions myself but thanks for confrming it. however i did put the ontario court.

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

I only studied International Law, Human Rights, that sort of thing. If you could use my help you'd be in serious trouble.

so if i get tried in geneva will you give me a discount?

 

[Sadomin]

Does sitting in prison for 14 years count?

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

thanks but i am done

keep the thread open, im studying law again next year

 

[Martin]

Does sitting in prison for 14 years count?

That depends. Do they have a good library of legal books?

 

[JCK]

thanks but i am done

keep the thread open, im studying law again next year

What are you studying this year?

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

enviromental remediation

apperantly you need to know law in order to fix the environment

 

[The Pado]

Supreme Court of Canada has a Justice Deschamps. Too cool.

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

thats true. i hadnt even noticed it

 

[Vinman]

i am sure this would not reqire much of your time and by all means i do understand if you do not have time.

i have this case
http://canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2006/2006scc41.html

and these questions to answer

[FONT=&quot](c) [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Which courts heard this case before it went to the Supreme Court? [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot](d) [/FONT][FONT=&quot]What was the jurisdiction issue before the Supreme Court?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] How did the court decide this issue? What were its reasons? [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot](e) [/FONT][FONT=&quot]What was theratio decidendi in this case?[/FONT]


the marking scheme seems to suggest that they do not require very thorough answers


thank you in advance

nice to see that your making others do your simple homework