LISTEN UP! (2 Viewers)

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Well, we can also turn our rep on or off in our control panel, that is at least what the Marty said.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Respaul]

The idea of showing who gave what will jus cause arguments or excessive praise... whats the point

Its the way its implemented that needs to be looked at

 

[Bjerknes]

Who the hell fvcking cares. I just received 5 neg reps in the past 24 hours, and whoever is doing it can keep it up cuz I don't really give a damn.

 

[Respaul]

How can you turn it off ?

 

[Snoop]

If my idea isnt taken into consideration then I suggest everyone that liked my idea to put their name in the comments box everytime they give someone a rep

read Paul's Post Fab,I think it's a good one.everytime you give someone a negative reputation, he will tell "which gay gave me that".or just look Burke's reaction,because I wrote my name in the reputaion.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

How can you turn it off ?

Somewhere in your user CP.

 

[Respaul]

Who the hell fvcking cares. I just received 5 neg reps in the past 24 hours, and whoever is doing it can keep it up cuz I don't really give a damn.

but you obviously do andy, as you keep going on about it... And if someone told you who it was its a no brainer that you would go and ende up in an argument with them..

 

[JCK]

How can you turn it off ?

In User CP -> Edit Options, you can either show it or not, it is not turning it off.

 

[Dragon]

Then there should be a rule about if someone wants to argue with whomever gave them a negative post they cannot do it publicly, and they should settle that via PMs

 

[The Goalkeeper]

there should be a way so that reps aren't handed out anonimously...

 

[Bjerknes]

It's also unfair how everybody has started out on equal playing fields...some people who don't have any rep at all have given more to this forum than some in the top 20 ever have and probably ever will. Why there was not some sort of introductory system is beyond me and this rep thing was destined to fail because of it.

People who give out neg rep should be required to give a reason why as well.

 

[Respaul]

Then there should be a rule about if someone wants to argue with whomever gave them a negative post they cannot do it publicly, and they should settle that via PMs

its not allways that simple, whether we like it or not, people will get into it rules or not, They jus use a different reason to argue with someone they feel wronged them...

Why do we see so often arguments between the same sets of people... they dont allways disagree, they seek confrontation with those they dont like... its normal

 

[JCK]

there should be a way so that reps aren't handed out anonimously...

I know you gave me negative points yesterday

These were the only negative rep points I received that had a reason, and it was fair enough (I guess)

 

[Respaul]

It's also unfair how everybody has started out on equal playing fields...some people who don't have any rep at all have given more to this forum than some in the top 20 ever have and probably ever will. Why there was not some sort of introductory system is beyond me and this rep thing was destined to fail because of it.

People who give out neg rep should be required to give a reason why as well.

totally agree

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

I know you gave me negative points yesterday

These were the only negative rep points I received that had a reason, and it was fair enough (I guess)

Me too, I don't think it was warranted though.

 

[Bjerknes]

but you obviously do andy, as you keep going on about it... And if someone told you who it was its a no brainer that you would go and ende up in an argument with them..

I don't care that much about it Paul...I know three who have given me neg rep and have only took the subject up with one of them. It's just frustrating how every time I look at my user CP I see another neg rep...for absolutely nothing. And besides that, it's comical what the neg rep was given for, hence me pointing it out.

Neg rep for starting the NHL thread is funny indeed...even you thought it was.

 

[Dragon]

its not allways that simple, whether we like it or not, people will get into it rules or not, They jus use a different reason to argue with someone they feel wronged them...

Why do we see so often arguments between the same sets of people... they dont allways disagree, they seek confrontation with those they dont like... its normal

Then thats what mods are for. If they see certain members wanting an argument/trouble on why they received a neg rep then they should close that thread immediatly and warn those members. Mods should be able to do that its not that hard

 

[Dragon]

Neg rep for starting the NHL thread is funny indeed...even you thought it was.

It was genius and I wish I were the one who did it

 

[Respaul]

Then thats what mods are for. If they see certain members wanting an argument/trouble on why they received a neg rep then they should close that thread immediatly and warn those members. Mods should be able to do that its not that hard

Its not hard if a mod is allways here and reads everypost... sadly that isnt reality....Its impossible

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

I don't care that much about it Paul...I know three who have given me neg rep and have only took the subject up with one of them. It's just frustrating how every time I look at my user CP I see another neg rep...for absolutely nothing. And besides that, it's comical what the neg rep was given for, hence me pointing it out.

Neg rep for starting the NHL thread is funny indeed...even you thought it was.

I agree with this piece.



354 +REPS, BECKER!!!