Yes but still it happened. A coach that won nothing turned out to be a great choice.
That's because it's possible he was always a good coach and his teams were obviously shit. Success of the coach is always heavily dependent on the players he has. I don't want Sarri here but if coached us last year, he would have won the Scudetto. Then does he become a great coach? Not necessarily.
The argument of, "What did he win?" is like the simplest, most un-analytical argument possible. Should we hire Di Matteo since won UCL? Or bring back Ranieri since he won EPL?
Are they better than Pochettino who won nothing? It's so dumb, these arguments.
That's because it's possible he was always a good coach and his teams were obviously shit. Success of the coach is always heavily dependent on the players he has. I don't want Sarri here but if coached us last year, he would have won the Scudetto. Then does he become a great coach? Not necessarily.
The argument of, "What did he win?" is like the simplest, most un-analytical argument possible. Should we hire Di Matteo since won UCL? Or bring back Ranieri since he won EPL?
Are they better than Pochettino who won nothing? It's so dumb, these arguments.
I'm not sure some on here quite understand how difficult it is to win let alone win multiple years in a row. It's certainly not a foregone conclusion that we simply win because we're Juventus. You need constant motivation and concentration on top of the obvious football ability in order to keep winning. The mental part of football is too often forgotten and I'll guess we'll find out soon how well Sarri handles that part here.
