Marchionni isn't a starter. Camoranesi is. Yesterday's match was probably the only one where Camo was fit to play 90 minutes and didn't start the match.
You keep saying for months that Marchionni is a starter, and it is true that he was starting the matches, but it was only because the main MR in the team was injured most of the time, and that's something we couldn't predict before the season started.
It's just like saying that Manninger is a starter.
You're right about the defense, though.
Camo already proved last season, that he is not reliable for one reason, or the other, to be our starter for the season. And Marchionni already proved, that he was not fit for the job, of replacing for a big part of the season, it doesnt matter if it is 40-80%
Fact is, that we were going to use him for at least 40% of the season anyway.
I particularly insisted that this is an issue we need to get fix asap, by the end of the last year. What did our board did to fix that?? And our CB/RB issues, we also knew of Zebina'a and Andrade's condition, please dont tell me that you also consider Mellberg and Grygera as unfortunate incidents too.
The board brought poor Ekdall and free Melberg for players we need reliable starters for injury prone players and then wasted the money on Amauri and Poulsen, for the places we were stacked up.
They had no excuses and here we are now suffering from the some problems we had last year and they ignored...
I knew with certainty that if they wont find a permanent fix for those issues, the LB, RB, CB and RM will haunt us for this season.
I am sure that you remember how much i insisted for permanent fixes of these positions or at least half of them, if we cant afford all of them within a year.
Our board did nothing to fix them and they take full responsibility, because they ignored all of them!! Which means the never intend to fix them and they proved that by throwing the money away on Poulsen. I can accept that we made an exception for an opportunity and valuable target like Amauri, who will help us in the future. But why Poulsen too instead of any of our needs??
This is unacceptable!!!
Considering Buffon's back issues and form, Manninger was the best wisest move this board has ever done!! I wish they would have done the same for the places it mattered the most!!
Iaquinta should just be a back up while Palladino and Giovinco aren't strikers.If we hadn't bought him we'd be in deeper shit right now.You can defend but you can't score, well, fuck that.If we had a good defender and seeing Trez being injured all the time people would cry for some striker because Iaquinta would not be capable of doing Amauri's job.Even if we had those 13mln I doubt we'd get some good defender.
You're not looking at the whole picture.If we buy Cassano that means we're NOT going to play 4-4-2 and it means that HE'S Nedved's replacement who will be used on a different way
Cassano-Giovinco
Amauri
If you say you wouldn't like Cassano it also means that you wouldn't like Diego because it's the same thing...anyway, you can relax because seeing Lippi coming over makes us avoid Cassano.
Palla isnt a striker? What is he then?? Giovinco, between other was also hinted as DP's heir, if we didnt have an abundance of option, we could have used him more.
Point is, we had one more promising player already available, whilst in other places, just an injury prone-always injured player and a non Juve-material one.
To strengthen those weaker position should have been a priority!
As this season has shown.