Juve want Pazzini and Montolivo (2 Viewers)

CORVETTE

Malato di Juve , , 29
Oct 13, 2005
2,935
#62
both did not do anything in roma match , toni was the main man
What ? , actually Pazzini didn't play any minute in Roma match yesterday ..

and you said Toni was the main man ? what about his fool pass to Mutu that was going to lead Viola to their first goal ?
 

V

Senior Member
Jun 8, 2005
20,110
#64
  • V

    V

Well if they can't find a starting place in Fiorentina how are they gonna get one in Juventus?
 

Dominic

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2004
16,692
#65
I don't rate Pazzini, we don't need another talented support striker anyway.. quite the opposite.

Montolivo could be a good player in the future. I think he'd be overpriced though, we'd be paying for his reputation of being talented(and also fiorentina won't sell cheap to a rival) instead of actually his quality.

So all in all I think we should go for neither.
 

sateeh

Day Walker
Jul 28, 2003
8,020
#66
Well if they can't find a starting place in Fiorentina how are they gonna get one in Juventus?
Montolivo is a starter for Fiorentina and I wouldn't even consider Pazzini as Mutu and Toni have the best partnership in Europe atm.
I don't rate Pazzini, we don't need another talented support striker anyway.. quite the opposite.

Montolivo could be a good player in the future. I think he'd be overpriced though, we'd be paying for his reputation of being talented(and also fiorentina won't sell cheap to a rival) instead of actually his quality.

So all in all I think we should go for neither.
For Montolivo his price would be very high but imo he is the best young talent in Italy.If we can get him in a decent price then i think we should go for him.To me 10m should be the limit.
 

Desmond

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2002
8,938
#80
Montolivo and Pazzini were options we looked at two years ago and passed up in favour of other options, and I cannot see why we would purchase them now especially with these inflated prices. Fiorentina are in a far better position to negotiate with us over the pair, after all.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)