Juan Cuadrado (53 Viewers)

Cuads legacy


  • Total voters
    48
  • Poll closed .

DUKAC

Senior Member
Feb 29, 2012
12,283
#42
He is our saviour.He can/will adapt in any system.No problem about him.He will feed Mandzukic with no less than 20 passes per game.
 

Vlad

In Allegri We Trust
May 23, 2011
23,990
#43
He's not the player we could overly rely on, he's too limited for that task and he won't be brought for this. Won't be a key player, nor will we treat him as such. This team is too good for that, but as one of the options in attacking 3rd, as someone to give more facets to our game, he can be very useful during the course of the season.
 

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
#46
He's not the player we could overly rely on, he's too limited for that task and he won't be brought for this. Won't be a key player, nor will we treat him as such. This team is too good for that, but as one of the options in attacking 3rd, as someone to give more facets to our game, he can be very useful during the course of the season.
He will be one of the best players.
 

DUKAC

Senior Member
Feb 29, 2012
12,283
#49
Fascinating.At least he had a better and a shorter haircut now .Although he is very quick he will be obviously quicker now.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
#50
Him and Salah are just the type of supporting cast you need around your marquee players. He's going to give us the extra dimension in attack and I fail to see how people are missing that, if they're criticising this move. And he's not here instead of an AM, he's here in addition to one. Which is why that's great.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,480
#52
One poor season does this.

If he arrived last year people would be far more enthusiastic. Quality signing.
Depends, IMO my view of him dont change because it was predictable he wouldnt work out in Chelsea. What was suprising was how little he actually played, if he actually played enough and was just flat out bad, I could understand rating him less in a way, but he was regularly just underused and sidestepped. Pretty much once in blue moon 20 minutes sub appearance.

- - - Updated - - -

Him and Salah are just the type of supporting cast you need around your marquee players. He's going to give us the extra dimension in attack and I fail to see how people are missing that, if they're criticising this move. And he's not here instead of an AM, he's here in addition to one. Which is why that's great.
He is UNDOUBTLY better then Salah for me, the later seems little more calm and tidy player, but individually the colombian can just flat out embarrass anyone at any situation 1-1, plus is more of a creator then Salah (crossing mainly besides cutting in and shooting), who is more about finishing chances himself.
 

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
64,572
#55
Depends, IMO my view of him dont change because it was predictable he wouldnt work out in Chelsea.
i did not really follow him at chelsea, but according to whoscored mou used him as AM?
is that true?
then i would understand why he did suck.

nevermind, its only CA stats :lol::sergio:

but anyway, where did mou play him?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 46)