He's not the player we could overly rely on, he's too limited for that task and he won't be brought for this. Won't be a key player, nor will we treat him as such. This team is too good for that, but as one of the options in attacking 3rd, as someone to give more facets to our game, he can be very useful during the course of the season.
He's not the player we could overly rely on, he's too limited for that task and he won't be brought for this. Won't be a key player, nor will we treat him as such. This team is too good for that, but as one of the options in attacking 3rd, as someone to give more facets to our game, he can be very useful during the course of the season.
Him and Salah are just the type of supporting cast you need around your marquee players. He's going to give us the extra dimension in attack and I fail to see how people are missing that, if they're criticising this move. And he's not here instead of an AM, he's here in addition to one. Which is why that's great.
Depends, IMO my view of him dont change because it was predictable he wouldnt work out in Chelsea. What was suprising was how little he actually played, if he actually played enough and was just flat out bad, I could understand rating him less in a way, but he was regularly just underused and sidestepped. Pretty much once in blue moon 20 minutes sub appearance.
Him and Salah are just the type of supporting cast you need around your marquee players. He's going to give us the extra dimension in attack and I fail to see how people are missing that, if they're criticising this move. And he's not here instead of an AM, he's here in addition to one. Which is why that's great.
He is UNDOUBTLY better then Salah for me, the later seems little more calm and tidy player, but individually the colombian can just flat out embarrass anyone at any situation 1-1, plus is more of a creator then Salah (crossing mainly besides cutting in and shooting), who is more about finishing chances himself.