It's never a good reason to get rid of players because they are inactive. The numbers are still very important. In fact, Gs always use that. I'm sticking with you for now.
No, you're both wrong! The only reason we 2 are in the crosshair is because we post the most. The G's could really be sitting in the darkness and waiting it out. Voting out inactives is the right way to go when the actives are civilians, like me.
No, you're both wrong! The only reason we 2 are in the crosshair is because we post the most. The G's could really be sitting in the darkness and waiting it out. Voting out inactives is the right way to go when the actives are civilians, like me.
Pity. He's the most sensible players of us all, despite being imperfect.
We can't tell for sure whi the citizens or G's are so right now it would be taking a big gamble. I do think the inactives should be lynched jsut for the sake of being inactive and hopefully the G's stick with the inactive citizens to make the game more fair, but we're in a bad position right now. It's 11-4 which could turn into 10-5 at the drop of a hat. We can't just risk picking anyone.
We can't tell for sure whi the citizens or G's are so right now it would be taking a big gamble. I do think the inactives should be lynched jsut for the sake of being inactive and hopefully the G's stick with the inactive citizens to make the game more fair, but we're in a bad position right now. It's 11-4 which could turn into 10-5 at the drop of a hat. We can't just risk picking anyone.
Then are you willing to vote No Lynch? Cos that's the only way we can minimize our losses. I'm down to changing my vote to No Lynch if most people are willing to do it. It'll only mean we'll lose 1 guy instead of 2.
Then are you willing to vote No Lynch? Cos that's the only way we can minimize our losses. I'm down to changing my vote to No Lynch if most people are willing to do it. It'll only mean we'll lose 1 guy instead of 2.
Then are you willing to vote No Lynch? Cos that's the only way we can minimize our losses. I'm down to changing my vote to No Lynch if most people are willing to do it. It'll only mean we'll lose 1 guy instead of 2.
I am not sure about Sheik. I am not going to vote for him, but if he gets voted out and turns out to be a C - we should hunt down everyone who voted for him, or made people vote for him.
If he is a G, we should take down those who protected him. I couldn't care less, if Sheik gotta go, he gotta go. It'll be a sacrifice worth taking.