Are you trying to get the D to reveal him/herself?
To the D: don't make yourself known to anyone. Thank you.
To the D: don't make yourself known to anyone. Thank you.
Buy on AliExpress.com
It's a Nice Day for a Tuz Wedding (10 Viewers)
- Thread starter Kate
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
That is partly what I said, fool.
But if the D investigates a G then he should say it. That's how I won you the game some months ago when I got Fred on day 1. The Bodyguard will protect the D from whacking and we can lynch the investigated gangster.
But you know this very well. Why are you then telling the D not to reveal himself under any condition?
But if the D investigates a G then he should say it. That's how I won you the game some months ago when I got Fred on day 1. The Bodyguard will protect the D from whacking and we can lynch the investigated gangster.
But you know this very well. Why are you then telling the D not to reveal himself under any condition?
The D should not reveal himself on day 1 for the sake of 1 G. You know this, although the rest may not. Lose the D now and the game is all but lost for the Cs.Lose the D now and the Gs will hide among random voting while whacking the Cs, one by one, while they also eliminate themselves with random votes thanks to being D-less.
I see that Janna has most of the votes and I don't see a reason for that.
Usually a No Lynch suits the G, but since we started with 12:4, which will become 11:5, and since we don't have a strong suspect, this time we really can't risk losing two civilians. That's why I vote No Lynch. We will need a foolish G to make a mistake or the D to investigate a G in order to start from somewhere. The way things stand, nobody should be sacrificed.
Except the inactives. I'm always for voting them out. But the inactive person is Katie and we all have a weak spot for her so I suggest we don't lynch her
Usually a No Lynch suits the G, but since we started with 12:4, which will become 11:5, and since we don't have a strong suspect, this time we really can't risk losing two civilians. That's why I vote No Lynch. We will need a foolish G to make a mistake or the D to investigate a G in order to start from somewhere. The way things stand, nobody should be sacrificed.
Except the inactives. I'm always for voting them out. But the inactive person is Katie and we all have a weak spot for her so I suggest we don't lynch her
The D should not reveal himself on day 1 for the sake of 1 G. You know this, although the rest may not. Lose the D now and the game is all but lost for the Cs.Lose the D now and the Gs will hide among random voting while whacking the Cs, one by one, while they also eliminate themselves with random votes thanks to being D-less.
One day the jailer can jail the D and save him from being whacked. The next day the bodyguard will protect him. By revealing himself the D makes sure that he won't be whacked. If he doesn't reveal himself there is always the chance of a lucky guess by the Gs.
Unless the D can find the BG and the jailer without revealing himself publicly, then he should reveal himself.
But only if he finds a G and proves his role when we lynch that G.
You definitely know all this after playing so many games. Why do you keep acting ignorant?
It will take at least 3 days before both jailers and the BG are out. Until then the D will finish most of the work and be protected. But the chance those special roles to be all cleaned after three days is minimal.
There is absolutely no point for the D to work from the shadows if he investigates a G. Yeah, he can stay in the shadow and blaze the G the next day, but that way he will lose an investigation.
There is absolutely no point for the D to work from the shadows if he investigates a G. Yeah, he can stay in the shadow and blaze the G the next day, but that way he will lose an investigation.
WHy 3 days? The G whack someone today, 1 in 6 chance, one of them is J or BG. 2 days, 1 in 3 chance.
And they only need one out. The jailer and BG can't protect the same person 2 days straight, they can alternate. But if 1 is gone, then the other saves the D today, tomorrow he's dead.
Revealing the D so early has never been a good idea, never been done. You are trying to take advantage of the fact that there are so many newbies.
And they only need one out. The jailer and BG can't protect the same person 2 days straight, they can alternate. But if 1 is gone, then the other saves the D today, tomorrow he's dead.
Revealing the D so early has never been a good idea, never been done. You are trying to take advantage of the fact that there are so many newbies.
How was it not done ever? I alone did it twice and we won those games easily (although the second time I made Hoori act as the D and cover for me).
It's incredibly stupid to investigate a G and hide it. Will the D take that knowledge with him to his grave?
Explain to me, if you were the D and you investigated a G today, how would you have played it?
It's incredibly stupid to investigate a G and hide it. Will the D take that knowledge with him to his grave?
Explain to me, if you were the D and you investigated a G today, how would you have played it?