[ITA] Serie A 2011/2012 (41 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Status
How the fuck did inter get so close to CL place? 
Anyone but inter, at best i can tolerate napoli in cl but merda? fuck no.
Lazio fucking choking useless floating lumps of turds can't hold on to their good start, Udinese riding on their midget's dick and after he blew his load and went soft they all fell down, dusan's roma are fucking useless no expectations there.
Can't have inter in CL, hell no!
Anyone but inter, at best i can tolerate napoli in cl but merda? fuck no.Lazio fucking choking useless floating lumps of turds can't hold on to their good start, Udinese riding on their midget's dick and after he blew his load and went soft they all fell down, dusan's roma are fucking useless no expectations there.
Can't have inter in CL, hell no!
Quite interesting was Roma-Napoli.
Napoli got pinned back in the first half because their wingbacks were scared to go beyond Bojan and Borini very often.
They also looked vulnerable because no-one was picking up Totti or the midfield runners, so Totti could set up the play and the midfield runners could get into the box unmarked, which is exactly what happened with Roma's first goal.
Napoli also looked lost playing with an extra midfielder. Dzemaili and Hamsik didn't cover for the absence of Lavezzi by playing closer to Cavani, so he was left very isolated in the first half.
Though Napoli's equaliser came out of nothing, Napoli grew into the game because of it and tactical changes at half time. The wingbacks got higher up the pitch and Inler closed down Totti a lot better. This allowed Napoli to get players higher up the pitch and also disrupt Roma's rhythm.
They also looked better when Pandev came on and gave closer support to Cavani. Roma looked really clueless as to how to deal with Pandev when he was playing between defence and midfield.
Then Napoli, as they often do, sat too deep and allowed crosses into the box too easily, and allowed Roma to nick and equaliser.
Napoli got pinned back in the first half because their wingbacks were scared to go beyond Bojan and Borini very often.
They also looked vulnerable because no-one was picking up Totti or the midfield runners, so Totti could set up the play and the midfield runners could get into the box unmarked, which is exactly what happened with Roma's first goal.
Napoli also looked lost playing with an extra midfielder. Dzemaili and Hamsik didn't cover for the absence of Lavezzi by playing closer to Cavani, so he was left very isolated in the first half.
Though Napoli's equaliser came out of nothing, Napoli grew into the game because of it and tactical changes at half time. The wingbacks got higher up the pitch and Inler closed down Totti a lot better. This allowed Napoli to get players higher up the pitch and also disrupt Roma's rhythm.
They also looked better when Pandev came on and gave closer support to Cavani. Roma looked really clueless as to how to deal with Pandev when he was playing between defence and midfield.
Then Napoli, as they often do, sat too deep and allowed crosses into the box too easily, and allowed Roma to nick and equaliser.
Serie A players in fear as fan violence and spectre of match-fixing return
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/apr/28/serie-a-violence-match-fixing
I think they are exaggerating the threat of violence from the Ultras in Italy just now, but some of the match-fixing stuff sounds interesting.
De Sanctis (and Napoli?) fucked?
"When caught, players deny everything, including the Naples goalkeeper who claimed innocence for hours until he was made to listen to a wiretap of himself offering to distribute bribes to teammates."
I'm assuming the article despite speaking about Naples means Napoli and not just a goalkeeper born in Naples.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/apr/28/serie-a-violence-match-fixing
I think they are exaggerating the threat of violence from the Ultras in Italy just now, but some of the match-fixing stuff sounds interesting.
De Sanctis (and Napoli?) fucked?
"When caught, players deny everything, including the Naples goalkeeper who claimed innocence for hours until he was made to listen to a wiretap of himself offering to distribute bribes to teammates."
I'm assuming the article despite speaking about Naples means Napoli and not just a goalkeeper born in Naples.
- Status