Israeli-Palestinian conflict (87 Viewers)

Is Hamas a Terrorist Organization?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should there be a Jewish nation SOMEWHERE in the world?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should Israel be a country located in the region it is right now?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

BayernFan

Senior Member
Feb 17, 2016
7,121
And I'm not going to argue with that. I admit and fully agree that Muslims have had their fair share of absolute monsters as well. And there still are plenty of such shameless animals around.
I know this is controversial and saying it to muslims can cause a lot of outrage, but your prophet really was a shit person in so many ways.

Yes it was a different time and different customs, but problem is when muslims in the 21st century see this guy as the epitome of mankind and think he was the perfect human being, when he infact was a pedofile and shit person through and through. Islam has a fundamental problem for thinking such a guy was the best thing to ever grace the Earth.

The big majority of muslims are very kind and friendly people, but islam as a religion needs a total reform to it’s core, its the 21st century after all. Problem is its supposed to be the word of God, so how do you change that, muslims probably wont allow/agree to it.
 
Last edited:

Tomice

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2009
3,024
But what you can “afford” is really the point here. Israel killed 43k civilians to avenge 1200 people killed in October 7. That’s almost a 36 to 1 ratio. How is that justified? How can you support that?
There is an argument there.

How are we arriving at those numbers? What sources? Since when all of them are civilians? What's the teal ratio between combatants and civilians killed?

Building an argument on numbers from one side of the conflict, with proven record of falsifying those is problematic to say the least.

Israel claim a ratio of 3:1. If true its far from unheard of, more so in the context of gaza. Sure it can and should be disputed, but I cant accept as a basis for an argument a blind acceptance of numbers from one side and auto dismissal of the numbers from the other. This is coming again to the point of using "facts" to serve a narrative. And it could be right and im wrong, but its not a foregone conclusion.

I also understand the use of the word avenge but it not purely that. Israel government vow to the public was elimination of hamas and return of the hosteges, this is the course of action they are taking, we can disagree if its the right way but revenge is a part of it not the whole.

- - - Updated - - -

I believe you care about human life. I do not think of you as a bad person.

Hamas did not 'start' this.

This is a conflict that has been going on since before Hamas existed. When, not if, Israel's genocide is examined, that examination will not be limited to events after October 7. They will take into account the decades of Israeli persecution before as well.

No one has defended Hamas. Not a single soul in the West has deemed it wise or necessary to do so. But Israel and its citizens keep coming back to this as a deflection tactic. Criticising Israel is not the same as justifying Hamas.

You might care about the life of Palestinian and Lebanese civilians. Israel and its government do not. Their actions have time and time again demonstrated as much. I know you refuse to accept this. Israel have bombed a refugee camp in a specific spot they told refugees they'd be safe. And the reasoning is always the same. We 'have' to do this. No, you don't. You want to. The collateral damage of civilians is not something that pains Israel, rather they use it as an instrument of fear. Israel are happy when civilians die. Their actions show as much.

Cut the bullshit.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
We are at an impasse I guess, it is what it is.

- - - Updated - - -

I can give you a long list of atrocities that you have committed if you would like me to plaster it over here. Please let me know.
And you still have very conveniently evaded my question if its kosher to kill all the people who have lost a loved one because now they don’t need any Iran or Hamas recruit them.
I really think that you guys should wipe out the whole of the middle east, Asia and Africa. That way you'll probably get rid of all the pesky subhumans.
The question itself show you have no need in an honest conversation. I wont dignify that with an answer
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,333
There is an argument there.

How are we arriving at those numbers? What sources? Since when all of them are civilians? What's the teal ratio between combatants and civilians killed?

Building an argument on numbers from one side of the conflict, with proven record of falsifying those is problematic to say the least.

Israel claim a ratio of 3:1. If true its far from unheard of, more so in the context of gaza. Sure it can and should be disputed, but I cant accept as a basis for an argument a blind acceptance of numbers from one side and auto dismissal of the numbers from the other. This is coming again to the point of using "facts" to serve a narrative. And it could be right and im wrong, but its not a foregone conclusion.

I also understand the use of the word avenge but it not purely that. Israel government vow to the public was elimination of hamas and return of the hosteges, this is the course of action they are taking, we can disagree if its the right way but revenge is a part of it not the whole.

- - - Updated - - -



We are at an impasse I guess, it is what it is.

- - - Updated - - -



The question itself show you have no need in an honest conversation. I wont dignify that with an answer
Compare your own train of thought with that of your government.

Surely you can see some discrepancies?

Can you say in good faith you believe Netanyahu considers Palestinian lives to have worth?

Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
 

Tomice

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2009
3,024
Compare your own train of thought with that of your government.

Surely you can see some discrepancies?

Can you say in good faith you believe Netanyahu considers Palestinian lives to have worth?

Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
Probably not because he is a sociopath. But I can say that in good faith of the army, in the context of a conflict.
I know how it operates and what type of people are calling the shots, it's not bibi.

Are there war crimes being done? 100%, are civilians being killed in mass just for effect? Absolutely not.

I know for a fact action and airstrikes have been called off due to civilians.

In an army context, as cold as it sounds, civilian lives gets a numerical value, it called NCV, there is a method to calculate the value of a target compared to the expected value of civilian lives lost. Can we disagree what those value should be? Of course, we probably do, but every action is considered trough that prism and passes a threshold.
Does this prove the we value human life as we should? Not at all, but it does say we do assign it some value. Otherwise gaza would be flat by now.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,333
Probably not because he is a sociopath. But I can say that in good faith of the army, in the context of a conflict.
I know how it operates and what type of people are calling the shots, it's not bibi.

Are there war crimes being done? 100%, are civilians being killed in mass just for effect? Absolutely not.

I know for a fact action and airstrikes have been called off due to civilians.

In an army context, as cold as it sounds, civilian lives gets a numerical value, it called NCV, there is a method to calculate the value of a target compared to the expected value of civilian lives lost. Can we disagree what those value should be? Of course, we probably do, but every action is considered trough that prism and passes a threshold.
Does this prove the we value human life as we should? Not at all, but it does say we do assign it some value. Otherwise gaza would be flat by now.
Well, I do not think of Israeli citizens and soldiers as any worse or any better than most people around the world.

I'm glad you highlight that Israeli soldiers do value human life and that within the army actions that would cause unnecessary loss of life do not go unopposed.

But if I'm honest, I expected that.

Very few people are so devoid of empathy that they slaughter without remorse.

My gripe is much more with the government of Israel. Apart from their decisions, there is also their discourse. They escalate this war every chance they get. The way they speak of Palestinians does very much imply they see them as subhuman.

And the longer this goes on, the more their discourse seeps into the mind of otherwise normal people.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
 

Tomice

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2009
3,024
Well, I do not think of Israeli citizens and soldiers as any worse or any better than most people around the world.

I'm glad you highlight that Israeli soldiers do value human life and that within the army actions that would cause unnecessary loss of life do not go unopposed.

But if I'm honest, I expected that.

Very few people are so devoid of empathy that they slaughter without remorse.

My gripe is much more with the government of Israel. Apart from their decisions, there is also their discourse. They escalate this war every chance they get. The way they speak of Palestinians does very much imply they see them as subhuman.

And the longer this goes on, the more their discourse seeps into the mind of otherwise normal people.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
On this we are in complete agreement
 

Mohad

The Ocean Star
May 20, 2009
6,689
I’d argue Hamas in its current form has nothing in common with an anti-oppression force. They’re acting more as an Iranian proxy allowing Iranian rulers to pursue their war against Israel without committing Iranian bodies.
No disagreement here.

Hamas are actually fools for thinking that siding with the Iranian rulers will benefit them.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,024
Probably not because he is a sociopath. But I can say that in good faith of the army, in the context of a conflict.
I know how it operates and what type of people are calling the shots, it's not bibi.

Are there war crimes being done? 100%, are civilians being killed in mass just for effect? Absolutely not.

I know for a fact action and airstrikes have been called off due to civilians.

In an army context, as cold as it sounds, civilian lives gets a numerical value, it called NCV, there is a method to calculate the value of a target compared to the expected value of civilian lives lost. Can we disagree what those value should be? Of course, we probably do, but every action is considered trough that prism and passes a threshold.
Does this prove the we value human life as we should? Not at all, but it does say we do assign it some value. Otherwise gaza would be flat by now.
Then how do you explain the exploding devices all over the place? They could have exploded in a busy market or someone's apartment where it was only that Hezbollah dunce amongst all sorts of Lebanese civilians.

And another question is - if IDF/Mossad is so amazing where they know where every single terrorist is at any given second, then how did hundreds of Hamas cross into IDF territory to conduct the raid last October?

You guys like to act like you make a lot of sense. But then you fucking dont.
 

Mohad

The Ocean Star
May 20, 2009
6,689
https://www.gazahealthcareletters.org/usa-letter-oct-2-2024

"However, every single signatory to this letter saw children in Gaza who suffered violence that must have been deliberately directed at them. Specifically, every one of us who worked in an emergency, intensive care, or surgical setting treated pre-teen children who were shot in the head or chest on a regular or even a daily basis. It is impossible that such widespread shooting of young children throughout Gaza, sustained over the course of an entire year is accidental or unknown to the highest Israeli civilian and military authorities."
The fear of future resistance haunts them.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,499

This visual moment should be the turning point for the entire world, to shift, rally and rage against televised blatant genocide.


But no, instead we will keep letting happening, dehumanising and ableing it by calling murdering literally Palestinian or lebanese toddlers as "young ladies:


https://x.com/AdameMedia/status/1845526615742095428?t=pvfdXLNaeuBGE5jcPI8Eug&s=19



And Israeli soldiers dying in action highlighted as teenagers or girls, while litterally bombing schools and killing litteral children, shooting them in the head and mentionning it as just mere numerical insignificant footnote IN THE SAME HEADLINE.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 81)