Israeli-Palestinian conflict (33 Viewers)

Is Hamas a Terrorist Organization?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should there be a Jewish nation SOMEWHERE in the world?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should Israel be a country located in the region it is right now?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,023
I think its only fair you know what he said... It's a popular Arab saying that literally means "Dogs bark and the caravan moves on". I think its pretty self explanatory
Yes, looking at all those smilies Manute added, it explains pretty well how he feels about the reactions of people complaining that it's only the women who are forbidden to do the things men can do.
 

Gamaro

The Arabian Knight
Aug 6, 2007
1,289
Hey towelhead, have the decency to insult us in English or fuck off.
Hahahaahaaaaaaaaa,i really enjoyed how u ppl got pissed off,all of u since i knew Juventuz are just abusing muslims,Islam n our prophet n whenever we used to reply we were blocked by being told "FREEDOM OF SPEECH"

Now despite u all r claiming to be the most civilized ppl on earth but u all turned down ur favorite "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" and all attacked me in my Nationality n Culture transforming urself from the most civilized ppl to a bunch of RACISIT ATTACKERS.

Though u Irish Zebra call me a towelhead,but i have no any problem wearing a turban or any other thing u may find it funny.

And to ur knowledge Mr.Irish Zebra,we call Zebra in Arabic "7umar wa7shi" and the translation of it in English(so u won't get angry) is the wild donkey,so if u want me i can call u IRISH WILD DONKEY.
 

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
By saying that, you're much worse than him.
I'm comfortable enough with my lack of moral integrity to not be bothered by that my dearest Fred.


No seriously, if he said it to me or someone he's familiar with in the forum, it would have been acceptable, but by saying it to Gamaro, he's saying it to offend him, which means he really meant to use that word.
I sure did.
 

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
Hahahaahaaaaaaaaa,i really enjoyed how u ppl got pissed off,all of u since i knew Juventuz are just abusing muslims,Islam n our prophet n whenever we used to reply we were blocked by being told "FREEDOM OF SPEECH"

Now despite u all r claiming to be the most civilized ppl on earth but u all turned down ur favorite "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" and all attacked me in my Nationality n Culture transforming urself from the most civilized ppl to a bunch of RACISIT ATTACKERS.

Though u Irish Zebra call me a towelhead,but i have no any problem wearing a turban or any other thing u may find it funny.

And to ur knowledge Mr.Irish Zebra,we call Zebra in Arabic "7umar wa7shi" and the translation of it in English(so u won't get angry) is the wild donkey,so if u want me i can call u IRISH WILD DONKEY.
:lol:

This guy is epic.


Say what you want, you just have to say it in English.
 

Gamaro

The Arabian Knight
Aug 6, 2007
1,289
He ain't no Saudi. He's from Sudan, iirc.

Speaking of Sudan, what is Manute Bol doing these days?
I don't find what is the prob,if I'm from the same country Bol was?

U RACIST,are laughing at me cause i'm Sudanese,well i don't find any problem atleast we aren't a country that is only 19 yrs old:lol: .

U ppl better go back n join Serbia again cause without the Serbs u r nothing,oh TITO U MAY R.I.P.

One thing i have to notice u,i told Irish Zebra that u all are civilized countries that's true,BUT u r execluded because Croatia is not 1st World country u r still backward ppl.Oh no i remembered one thing that Croatia is the best in it,it is emporting prostitutes to De Wallen of Amesterdam.:rofl:
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,665
You should always speak english unless in a language specific thread. Especially if you've been in a heated argument. People who don't share the same language will assume the worse, even if it's only a joke or a anecdote.

As for the Matut Bol thing. It wasn't an insult to you or your country. We actually like Manut. At university we would have entire parties in his honor.
 

JBF

اختك يا زمن
Aug 5, 2006
18,451
Overreacting?

This fucking deserves an overreaction and the Europe case you bring regarding smoking is hilarious and would have made sense if Europe forbids the Arabs or the Chinese from smoking in public places but lets the others smoke.
I said in case of smoking they're banning half the picture while the rest is to come.

Look at it this way, somking is bad. Neither woman nor men should be allowed to smoke in public places, I think that's obvious. So banning the woman from doing just that is the first step from a full ban and since we already agreed how devastating public smoking is, woman have nothing to complain about. This is like making a law on prohibiting smoking weed in the streets and making woman the priority here, it should be for both genders no doubt, but prohibiting it for woman is far from a sexist aproach but rather a step in canceling this disease while banning men is yet to come.

And this case would be equal to forbidding smoking in public places, not forbidding onlt the women from smoking in public places. I, as a non-Muslim male will also be forbidden wearing the burqa. Hey, it might be my freedom of choice to wear a burqa, get inside the ladies room or inside a bank and rob it, but they won't let me do it. You see, they won't let me wear it too, not just the women.
You're talking about gender equality there while Im talking about freedom of choice which that ban clearly violates. Whether you're a man or a woman you've the right to wear whatever you want, whether it's a funny hat, your team's jersey, your African traditional clothes or simply a Burqa. Now that Burqa is to be banned while it's clear that only muslim woman are the one being targetted here for nothing but violating the "European traditions" enthough freedom of choice is marketed to be a European most proud invention.

So yea, banning woman from smoking in public places which is in fact dangerous on their health among with others is clearly much understandble than banning woman from wearing a burqa in public places for nothing but being a violation for the European way of life. Hamas suddebly looks much more democratic now than France regarding that.
 

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
Then next time if i wanna tell u something it would be in English,anyway u should have noticed that i said it to an arabic speaker member,But yet im sorry.

Now u said that u meant to offend me,so that was not "FREEDOM OF SPEECH",or what?
It sure is, I'm not inciting hatred, I've committed no defamation of your character. I've merely insulted you in a pan-ethnic manner.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
I said in case of smoking they're banning half the picture while the rest is to come.

Look at it this way, somking is bad. Neither woman nor men should be allowed to smoke in public places, I think that's obvious. So banning the woman from doing just that is the first step from a full ban and since we already agreed how devastating public smoking is, woman have nothing to complain about. This is like making a law on prohibiting smoking weed in the streets and making woman the priority here, it should be for both genders no doubt, but prohibiting it for woman is far from a sexist aproach but rather a step in canceling this disease while banning men is yet to come.
Just like prohibiting women from driving a car in Saudi Arabia is "far from sexist, only for concern of their safety while we will ban men driving cars later"?

Your theory is very interesting, this is the first time I've ever heard about a law that is intended "to protect group A now, but group B later". Does the law say anything about when they will ban smoking for men? Or are you completely making all this up?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 26)