Israeli-Palestinian conflict (39 Viewers)

Is Hamas a Terrorist Organization?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should there be a Jewish nation SOMEWHERE in the world?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should Israel be a country located in the region it is right now?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
OP

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,871
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #2,682
    Palestinian resistance just said it stops launching rockets and gives Zionists one week period to withdraw its tanks from all of Gaza Strip.

    This rest will be used as a break for tired civilians and to estimate the huge amount of disasters in Gaza.
     

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
    they won't nuke gaza for one reason.Because nuclear attack can affect jews too.
    it wouldn't be good entertainment for those who are watching bombardment with binoculars.
    please explain this to Rhizoid

    would like to see Vinman defend this one
    sorry I can see and understand both sides of the argument, unlike yourself
     

    CheSchifo!

    Senior Member
    Jan 11, 2009
    642
    would like to see Vinman defend this one
    Israel are obviously responsible for killing a four year old, but it's not as if they sent out the dogs. It's a horrible scene indeed, but why is the crime on Israel's part any less if the dead kid doesn't get eaten by dogs? It's the same bloody thing. Making it sound as if Israel somehow controls those dogs is not right.

    Its not the first time and it will not be the last
    Israel is the biggest human rights violator

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzV0_qa3UwM
    No, Israel is not. It's sad, but it probably isn't even the biggest human rights violator of the continent.
     

    Ahmed

    Principino
    Sep 3, 2006
    47,928
    Israel are obviously responsible for killing a four year old, but it's not as if they sent out the dogs. It's a horrible scene indeed, but why is the crime on Israel's part any less if the dead kid doesn't get eaten by dogs? It's the same bloody thing. Making it sound as if Israel somehow controls those dogs is not right.
    read the 4th paragraph of the article...in fact read the whole article properly
     

    BlanquiNegro

    Senior Member
    Mar 28, 2006
    949
    Israel are obviously responsible for killing a four year old, but it's not as if they sent out the dogs. It's a horrible scene indeed, but why is the crime on Israel's part any less if the dead kid doesn't get eaten by dogs? It's the same bloody thing. Making it sound as if Israel somehow controls those dogs is not right.



    No, Israel is not. It's sad, but it probably isn't even the biggest human rights violator of the continent.
    Well like saying Israel is locking up 40 person in a small house and sealing it completely from being reached by anyone from outside
    No food
    No water
    Nothing
    and then claiming that Israel didn't kill me
    They died of starvation not Israel
    because Israel is not the one controlling their GI system

    Israel is the biggest human rights violator no doubts
    or just give an example of a similar action done by non-Israeli

    U r denying it
    prove it if u can
     

    CheSchifo!

    Senior Member
    Jan 11, 2009
    642
    Well like saying Israel is locking up 40 person in a small house and sealing it completely from being reached by anyone from outside
    No food
    No water
    Nothing
    and then claiming that Israel didn't kill me
    They died of starvation not Israel
    because Israel is not the one controlling their GI system

    Israel is the biggest human rights violator no doubts
    or just give an example of a similar action done by non-Israeli

    U r denying it
    prove it if u can
    Have you been in the Congo lately?
     

    icemaη

    Rab's Husband - The Regista
    Moderator
    Aug 27, 2008
    36,370
    My point is that I don't really believe the Israelis set out dogs to eat corpses. It would be a hideous fact without any real purpose and it could lose them the little international support they have.
    They bombed a school run by the UN and got away with it... They'd just come up with an excuse like our dogs were hungry or something and still get away with it... the fact is Israel doesn't need International support or better put, they don't care about International support. They will still get their aid from the US, sell their military equipments to India etc etc. They have been killing people for a long time now and no country of worth has put any sanctions on them... Sending dogs out to eat corpses won't change anything IMO...
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,240
    Andries, we shouldn't be allowing terrible things to happen just because something worse happened in the past. I sort of get this feeling you're trying to deflect the issue at hand.
     

    CheSchifo!

    Senior Member
    Jan 11, 2009
    642
    Andries, we shouldn't be allowing terrible things to happen just because something worse happened in the past. I sort of get this feeling you're trying to deflect the issue at hand.
    The human rights violations in the Congo are not in the past.

    Perhaps they're even worse than they have ever been.

    But you don't know and you're not complaining about it.

    This kind of selection of human drama is quite annoying. Makes people lose all sense of perspective and makes them say stuff like "Israel is the biggest human rights violator in the world".

    Hell, even the USA is a bigger human rights violator. And from what I see a lot of countries very near to Israel aren't much better.

    Oh, and for the record: I think a lot of you actually mean international humanitarian law instead of human rights.
     

    BlanquiNegro

    Senior Member
    Mar 28, 2006
    949
    Andries, we shouldn't be allowing terrible things to happen just because something worse happened in the past. I sort of get this feeling you're trying to deflect the issue at hand.
    that's what i wanted him to say exactly
    that Israel is not the worst and countries like Angola are

    Well
    Not being the worst doesn't mean listing Israel in the good side
    but it simply means that Israel is bad enough to be in that bad side

    thanx 7
     

    Fred

    Senior Member
    Oct 2, 2003
    41,113
    Your favorite is a guy who was captured by the Mongols, held in a cage as a trophy, used as a footstool by the ruler of the Mongols while the normal Mongol soldiers were spitting on him and pissing on him and who killed himself because he couldn't handle the humiliation ?
    And plus he had a giant garlic on his head :D
    Thats not what they taught us at school, all they said was he was caught by Timur and died in prison shortly afterwards, nothing more nothing less :dissapointed:


    What was Bayazid's famous nickname btw?? I don't know how its said in English, as i took History in Arabic

    Edit: I just looked it up in Wikipedia, turns out its a direct translation from Arabic, he's nicknamed the thunderbolt :cool:
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 30)