Israeli-Palestinian conflict (64 Viewers)

Is Hamas a Terrorist Organization?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should there be a Jewish nation SOMEWHERE in the world?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should Israel be a country located in the region it is right now?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,229
ßüякε;1861761 said:
Well, you are right, they won't live with them, just speculation, but I agree to a point.

But I think Hamas is intentionally attacking Israel, which is fucked up.

"You called down the fire well now you got it."

Sort of thing.
Hamas was a democratically elected government. They are intentionally attacking Israel because Israel broke the cease fire, not allowing goods to flow into Gaza. We're talking about food, medical supplies, et cetera. It's essentially a huge blockade, which is an act of war.

Just imagine if somebody tried to blockade our interests from flowing into the country. There would be bombers in the air, destroyers at sea, tanks lining up at the coast to make sure the blockade would be no more.

Just because Hamas is considered a "terrorist" group for the West doesn't mean Israel can block their supplies, making Gazans suffer. That is the depth of the situation and I think they have a right to fight back, IMO.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
Jul 2, 2006
19,445
ßüякε;1861761 said:
I'm not a Jew, and I'm not being targeted.
you're living in USA right? you're not being targeted because your goverment serve them.People are saying USA support Israel but i think Israel are supporting USA.Your economy is in hands of Jew people.Your rich man list is dominated by them.if one day USA give up on supporting Israel, you wouldn't want to see havoc in your state.
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
My mistake for taking you seriously or thinking you have anything to say, when you just spew empty platitudes.
:yawn:
Hamas was a democratically elected government. They are intentionally attacking Israel because Israel broke the cease fire, not allowing goods to flow into Gaza. We're talking about food, medical supplies, et cetera. It's essentially a huge blockade, which is an act of war.

Just imagine if somebody tried to blockade our interests from flowing into the country. There would be bombers in the air, destroyers at sea, tanks lining up at the coast to make sure the blockade would be no more.

Just because Hamas is considered a "terrorist" group for the West doesn't mean Israel can block their supplies, making Gazans suffer. That is the depth of the situation and I think they have a right to fight back, IMO.
As we've already stated, so were the Nazis, and they were terrible too.

Israel did not originally break the cease fire, the rockets, home made or whatever, were fired on Israel first.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,229
True, but on the other hand, if your half-blind neighbor was shooting from an old shotgun at you, you probably wouldn't be too happy about it, would you?
Of course not. But if I'm blocking him from entering his own property or not allowing him to carry his groceries into his own home, he probably has a right to be a little upset at that. It's his property after all.

are McDonalds, Starbucks, and KFC sending money to support Isreal?
Probably.
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
you're living in USA right? you're not being targeted because your goverment serve them.People are saying USA support Israel but i think Israel are supporting USA.Your economy is in hands of Jew people.Your rich man list is dominated by them.if one day USA give up on supporting Israel, you wouldn't want to see havoc in your state.
So what about Jews in Albania, or Holland, or Canada, or even Turkey?

I'm sure there are some there.

WHy aren't they being targeted?

And Israel supports the US? Sure, just as much as Great Britain and Germany do.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,229
ßüякε;1861779 said:
:yawn:


As we've already stated, so were the Nazis, and they were terrible too.

Israel did not originally break the cease fire, the rockets, home made or whatever, were fired on Israel first.
No, they weren't. It was written in the cease fire agreement that Israel had to allow goods flow into Gaza. They didn't allow that to happen in November, which constitutes a breach in the cease fire whether they fired a bullet or not.
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
Of course not. But if I'm blocking him from entering his own property or not allowing him to carry his groceries into his own home, he probably has a right to be a little upset at that. It's his property after all.
Buying his house and his coming back 50 years later blasting you for not letting him in his house is different.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,665
Of course not. But if I'm blocking him from entering his own property or not allowing him to carry his groceries into his own home, he probably has a right to be a little upset at that. It's his property after all.
Unless his property was confiscated by the authorities and redistributed. After that it's no longer his property, whether or not it was right or wrong to confiscate and distribute the property in the first place. Ask an [American] Indian, he'll tell you how it is.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,665
you're living in USA right? you're not being targeted because your goverment serve them.People are saying USA support Israel but i think Israel are supporting USA.Your economy is in hands of Jew people.Your rich man list is dominated by them.if one day USA give up on supporting Israel, you wouldn't want to see havoc in your state.
Strike three you're out!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 55)