inter under investigation? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter mondo1
- Start date
That is a completely different idea. This is a sport, and there isn't much you can do. It's corrupt enough as is, and sometimes it's best to just move on and try your best. I've accepted this now, I know it's all allegations and presumptions but hey, what can you do? It just makes Juventus a stronger team in the end.
You really bring a smile to my face, sometimes.
The proof, bring me the proof.
And while you look for them, go to read also the sportive verdict that sent us to b. Pages 60-65, to be more precise. It states that no art 6 was broken. It states how they had to make up a new illicit to be able to relegate us. This, of course, it's out of anything ever seen in civil state. Laws can't be retroactive.
And while you search (and you will search for a long time), look also for the act of the ordinary justice that archives the case exactly on this matter, because considered as pointless, since months of investigation didn't bring them to anything that could make them suspect that the Championship was influenced by illicit behaviors. Yeah, the material was the same used for the sportive trail, but, in this case, the prosecutors weren't named by Guido Rossi.
If you still have a bit of time, read Sandulli's words. Sandulli was the head of the court that send us to B on appeal. He said: “There weren’t proofs, the verdict should probably been read and reconsidered altogether”. What about when he says that the Championship was regular, a part from maybe one match, Lecce-Parma?
Of course also De Biase's, Benedetto's and Cossiga's (Head of the Figc's prosecutor office during the calcio scandal of the '80s, ex sportive judge, ex president of the italian Republic) words on the matter are very interesting.
There would be much more to say, but I'll end just reminding you that the use of phone taps in any procedure different from the one they were disposed for is illegal itself. And this goes from the printing on newspapers to the use of such taps in other trials.
Btw, is it really possible that an ex dipendent of the railways could have more power of the sponsor of the championships (TIM) and the TV station that is vital for the survival of the championship itself (MEDIASET)?
The proof, bring me the proof.
And while you look for them, go to read also the sportive verdict that sent us to b. Pages 60-65, to be more precise. It states that no art 6 was broken. It states how they had to make up a new illicit to be able to relegate us. This, of course, it's out of anything ever seen in civil state. Laws can't be retroactive.
And while you search (and you will search for a long time), look also for the act of the ordinary justice that archives the case exactly on this matter, because considered as pointless, since months of investigation didn't bring them to anything that could make them suspect that the Championship was influenced by illicit behaviors. Yeah, the material was the same used for the sportive trail, but, in this case, the prosecutors weren't named by Guido Rossi.
If you still have a bit of time, read Sandulli's words. Sandulli was the head of the court that send us to B on appeal. He said: “There weren’t proofs, the verdict should probably been read and reconsidered altogether”. What about when he says that the Championship was regular, a part from maybe one match, Lecce-Parma?
Of course also De Biase's, Benedetto's and Cossiga's (Head of the Figc's prosecutor office during the calcio scandal of the '80s, ex sportive judge, ex president of the italian Republic) words on the matter are very interesting.
There would be much more to say, but I'll end just reminding you that the use of phone taps in any procedure different from the one they were disposed for is illegal itself. And this goes from the printing on newspapers to the use of such taps in other trials.
Btw, is it really possible that an ex dipendent of the railways could have more power of the sponsor of the championships (TIM) and the TV station that is vital for the survival of the championship itself (MEDIASET)?
unfortunatly for u, juventus to me is like my heart, i hold them so dearly as if they were my parents, u cut me open i bleed black n white, to think supporting juve is a 90 min thing at a weekend is not my thing, its a lifestyle i live and love.
as for what can u do? well theres 'f*ck u inter milan' day on the 12th feb
as for what can u do? well theres 'f*ck u inter milan' day on the 12th feb
why dont u stop insulting my love for juve i bleed black n white cuz i was born to support them, not to cheer them for 90 mins and do it all again the next week, my juve maglia is my skin, my blood is black n white, if u cant appreciate that, do urself a favour and join the binter gang, i dont appreciate lame ass replies like that.
BRING YOU THE PROOF???
You are the one that has something to prove, YOU think Juve are innocent, YOU think they have been done wrong.
EVERYONE else has accepted it.
So, YOU bring ME the proof....
(I didn't read anything but the first 18 words of your post because I only read posts less than 15 lines [including spaces])
Ohh, and just to let you know, since you are one of the rare TRUE Italians on here, I'll give you a little leeway, but I will be pretty harsh since I think you are a biased close-minded Hochkonjunkturhochkonjunkturmädchen. Ohh, and you make me smile too, when I look down.
BRING YOU THE PROOF???
You are the one that has something to prove, YOU think Juve are innocent, YOU think they have been done wrong.
EVERYONE else has accepted it.
So, YOU bring ME the proof....
(I didn't read anything but the first 18 words of your post because I only read posts less than 15 lines [including spaces])
Ohh, and just to let you know, since you are one of the rare TRUE Italians on here, I'll give you a little leeway, but I will be pretty harsh since I think you are a biased close-minded Hochkonjunkturhochkonjunkturmädchen. Ohh, and you make me smile too, when I look down.
You are the one that has something to prove, YOU think Juve are innocent, YOU think they have been done wrong.
EVERYONE else has accepted it.
So, YOU bring ME the proof....
(I didn't read anything but the first 18 words of your post because I only read posts less than 15 lines [including spaces])
Ohh, and just to let you know, since you are one of the rare TRUE Italians on here, I'll give you a little leeway, but I will be pretty harsh since I think you are a biased close-minded Hochkonjunkturhochkonjunkturmädchen. Ohh, and you make me smile too, when I look down.
They revoked our 2006 Scudetto based on irregularities during 2004-05, and reasoned that had Juve been exposed at the time then Juve would have not been in Serie A for 2005-06 and thus could not win the Scudetto.
So, if Inter are found to have falsified tax records to become eligible for the the 2005-06 season, why should they retain the "Scudetto" assigned to them? Shouldn't the Corrupt Republic apply the same rationale and vacate that Scudetto like our 2005 crown?
So, if Inter are found to have falsified tax records to become eligible for the the 2005-06 season, why should they retain the "Scudetto" assigned to them? Shouldn't the Corrupt Republic apply the same rationale and vacate that Scudetto like our 2005 crown?
