Hindsight: Edin Dzeko or Milos Krasic (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter Kasaki
- Start date
exercise.
I think Krasic is still the better option. Until Quags went down we were joint top scorers in Serie A. And what use would Dzeko be with no one at all to feed him the ball. If your playmakers are of high quality then they can make most forwards look decent.
Currently Krasic isn't doing as well as the start of the season, but neither is anyone else and lets not forget that he hasn't had a rest in basically 2 years.
Currently Krasic isn't doing as well as the start of the season, but neither is anyone else and lets not forget that he hasn't had a rest in basically 2 years.
Which one?
I defianetly think Krasic was the better option. If we'd thrown 35million at Dzeko we wouldn't have had enough for a decent rw and it would have been Pepe - Marchisio leading the most boring wings a team has ever had. (don't get me wrong I love Marchisio, but he's not a winger.)
With Dzeko I don't think we would have gotten Quagliarella either, I can't see Dzeko scoring that many more goals than Quag did up to January, and who's to say Dzeko wouldn't have bust his knee too?
I defianetly think Krasic was the better option. If we'd thrown 35million at Dzeko we wouldn't have had enough for a decent rw and it would have been Pepe - Marchisio leading the most boring wings a team has ever had. (don't get me wrong I love Marchisio, but he's not a winger.)
With Dzeko I don't think we would have gotten Quagliarella either, I can't see Dzeko scoring that many more goals than Quag did up to January, and who's to say Dzeko wouldn't have bust his knee too?
if you even bother to watch dzeko at man shitty, his running off the ball is quite slow and rather predictable to say the least, quite often he would be standing behind his marker, rather than getting in front of him, still i stand by my choice, i'd stick with krasic, who may not be world class, but sure as hell remains a more beneficial signing for us.
