Henrikh Mkhitaryan - AM RLC - Borussia Dortmund (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
I know but isnt it better to find a replacement this summer? And like i said before i dont see anything special about berardi

- - - Updated - - -



:xfinger:
@Hustini

it is. but we are getting one AM in the summer and thats it. not enough money to do more/not enough room in the squad to do more
 

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
Berardi doesnt have anything special about him. Lets see but i dont see him doing well
At this point Berardi > Mikhi for me.

The armenian is too much of a gamble for the limited funds we call our own. He is playing a disgusting season and always referring to his "good season" is not enough to justify a 20M+ transfer plus chunky wages.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
And your point is? I rather spend 20m on someone who we know is capable of having a good season. Berardi is still a gamble.

Igor is sayig Berardi is better than mkhitaryan
my point is we got a guy who scored 16 goals last season and is on 5 goals 6 assists halfway this season while playing as a winger for under 20M. thats a good deal
 

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
Ya I'm kinda iffy on Berardi but I'm pretty sure on Coman. Morata is already a decent player, he can only go up from here.
?

Berardi has shown much much more than Coman. You could argue that Coman has more potential, but he still needs a lot of work, and I think it isn't as certain that he'll fulfill it as most here are. There have been greater talents who flopped for unclear reasons. Berardi is much nearer to a "finished product" than Coman at the moment, and while I'm not 1005 sure that he'll succeed, he's already at a later stage in his development as Coman. Which is no problem really, Coman still has time, I mean even if his real breakthrough only happens 3 seasons from now, he'll still only be 21, younger than Morata is now.
 
Jul 13, 2010
6,825
At this point Berardi > Mikhi for me.

The armenian is too much of a gamble for the limited funds we call our own. He is playing a disgusting season and always referring to his "good season" is not enough to justify a 20M+ transfer plus chunky wages.
so the team is dependent on him, or what do you want to say? That he should shine when others are doing poorly?

http://www.whoscored.com/Players/28421/History/Henrikh-Mkhitaryan
http://int.soccerway.com/players/henrikh-mkhitaryan/39797/

I see more than one good season mate. And have you seen him play?
 

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
That he should shine when others are doing poorly?
I can't see how his teammates are to blame when he cannot stop a ball, play a pass or hit the goal from 15m .

He is not playing poorly because Dortmund sucks.
Dortmund sucks because he (and others) are playing poorly.
 
Jul 13, 2010
6,825
I can't see how his teammates are to blame when he cannot stop a ball, play a pass or hit the goal from 15m .

He is not playing poorly because Dortmund sucks.
Dortmund sucks because he (and others) are playing poorly.
and yet, whoscored (who is not run by any relatives of henrikh) says that he is second best player on the team. If thats his terrible season, I'd like to have him
 

Joe

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2009
14,980
I could see us going realistically going for Mkhitaryan this summer.

Probably Mkhitaryan, loan + obligation to buy next summer. Zaza and Rugani. Then clean up all of our co-ownerships.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)