samsung is not a common brand by far. if you read quality comparison reviews then you will see that samsung manufactures some of the finest lcd's on the market. vizio is the most common brand fyi
samsung is not a common brand by far. if you read quality comparison reviews then you will see that samsung manufactures some of the finest lcd's on the market. vizio is the most common brand fyi
Actually, LG and Samsung are now the only LCD panel manufacturers. Other companies use their panels and apply their own technology, ie Sony and Bravia.
Samsung is an excellent choice. I have a 55 inch DLP 1080 TV, and its just fantastic for gaming. Add a sony surround system to that, and it is a total mindfuck while playing Gears of War 2 or resistance 2.
Bah, it all depends on the model, name alone doesn't mean anything. You can get a cheap Samsung whose quality is on par with a Quadro. More money, better quality, in a nutshell.
Older Plasma panels had a short life-time, Dru. And Plasmas don't suck, when watching sports or movies they are much better and they IF they have a short lifetime then it's worth it.
Older Plasma panels had a short life-time, Dru. And Plasmas don't suck, when watching sports or movies they are much better and they IF they have a short lifetime then it's worth it.
the reason why i don't like plasma's is because of the dead pixel issues and the tiny bulbs in the plasma units which are infamous for breaking and burning out. friends of mine who chose plasma over lcd's regret it because during mounting or moving they incurred damages on their unit.
and how is it worth it if they have a shorter lifespan? wouldn't you want your investment to last longer?