No. That's not what I meant. This is how you do it legally:
In 2002 the judge says that Italians are sore losers, because they can't accept the myriad of wrong calls. The Koreans have every right to go through. They're not cheaters.
In 2006 the judge should stand by his judgment from 2002. He obviously cannot say the Italians are cheaters here.
In 2002 the judge says that Italians are sore losers, because they can't accept the myriad of wrong calls. The Koreans have every right to go through. They're not cheaters.
In 2006 the judge should stand by his judgment from 2002. He obviously cannot say the Italians are cheaters here.
If you feel you must justify each case based on each other I have to disagree. They're very much separate issues. For me at least.
