Bla bla fuckin bla. Give me any top coach who's won titles with big teams and I can make the same shitty argument; you probably choose who gets credit for titles and who doesn't. Why does a manager of the most expensively assembled team in the history of football get credit for winning the CL with Real Madrid? why does the manager who has spent more than any other manager in the history of the game get credit for the titles he won(Mourinho)? Why do you give credit to a manager like Lippi, who won titles with Juve teams that boasted the likes of a prime Del Piero, Zidane, Davids, Deschamps, Inzaghi, Trezeguet, Buffon, Peruzzi etc. It's a fucking stupid argument, even if you have the best players in the world, it takes a top coach to make them function as a team, and continuously and consistently win the titles Pep has won over the past 6-7 years. But I've been over this a million times, so keep saying he's an average coach while he breaks record after record, and wins title after title.
If I asked you to name the best 5 coaches in the past 15 years, I'll bet half the list are Italians.
So do I have your word you won't use that argument in a DP vs Totti debate?