Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,987
Th giovinco deal is turning into crap and fast...now that you mention it. At least taking in consideration his impact.

But they never should have sold his half for 3 mils. That was a shit mistake
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
"we shouldnt have sold him, we shouldnt have brought him back"

what is it now, he was to good, so he should have stayed and we corrected that last year
or he is not good enough, so selling him was not a bad thing, getting him back was.

Make up your minds
 

Buck Fuddy

Lara Chedraoui fanboy
May 22, 2009
10,888
I am not sure. It's not mentioned before. Maybe 1.5 for loan another 2 for co-own.
I take it you're not aware the club communicates all this stuff? That's odd. Seeing how you're someone who complains all the time, you'd think you were perfectly aware of everything.

1m for the loan, 3 for the co-own, 11 to get him back.

http://www.juventus.com/wps/wcm/con...&CACHEID=d2d93b65-7792-4f7b-a227-cd9e4f46963e
http://www.juventus.com/wps/wcm/con...&CACHEID=9c63a0e1-95df-4dc9-853b-a277ae94400a
http://www.juventus.com/wps/wcm/con...&CACHEID=53a0a161-05a7-4389-9951-6a74bfaccb58
 
Jul 2, 2006
19,440
I take it you're not aware the club communicates all this stuff? That's odd. Seeing how you're someone who complains all the time, you'd think you were perfectly aware of everything.

1m for the loan, 3 for the co-own, 11 to get him back.

http://www.juventus.com/wps/wcm/con...&CACHEID=d2d93b65-7792-4f7b-a227-cd9e4f46963e
http://www.juventus.com/wps/wcm/con...&CACHEID=9c63a0e1-95df-4dc9-853b-a277ae94400a
http://www.juventus.com/wps/wcm/con...&CACHEID=53a0a161-05a7-4389-9951-6a74bfaccb58
SO it's not the 3.5m but 4m. I guess i am wrong again, just like the time i said we have %100 attendances but in reality it was something like %97.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,967
we paid 7M net to regain a player that was worth easily double, maybe even more than that.
To put it simply Giovinco was worth around twice as much when we brought him back than when we sold him, which is completely normal for a striker in form compared to a bit-part striker with just potential.
 

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,905
"we shouldnt have sold him, we shouldnt have brought him back"

what is it now, he was to good, so he should have stayed and we corrected that last year
or he is not good enough, so selling him was not a bad thing, getting him back was.

Make up your minds
People on the forums busted a collective nut when we re-acquired the little bastard last summer. Hindsight anyone?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 74)