Juve_fanatic

Second coolest member!
Apr 5, 2006
7,618
Still, the author made a valid point, we will end up paying 30 million for 3 bench/depth players.
That os why i dont buy that whole "we dont have money" argument....we have been one of the biggest spenders in europe these last two years. One 30 mil player can have a much larger impact than 3 ,10 mil players.
 

Buck Fuddy

Lara Chedraoui fanboy
May 22, 2009
10,880
That os why i dont buy that whole "we dont have money" argument....we have been one of the biggest spenders in europe these last two years. One 30 mil player can have a much larger impact than 3 ,10 mil players.
I just had a crazy idea.

Let's take a look at net spend over the past 2.5 years & take irrelevant stuff such as wages paid into account.



Nah, never mind. That would just be too crazy.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Balotelli è costato 20 milioni, pagabili in quattro anni. Isla, Padoin e Peluso costeranno in tutto 30 milioni. Dove è l'errore?

Balotetlli was bought for 20 million, payable in 4 years. Isla, Padoin and Peluso cost Juve 30 million. Where is the error?

http://www.tuttojuve.com/?action=read&idnotizia=127614
His starting price was 37mil, they got him for 20, now why would that be ?


Perhaps because

- He only wanted to go to milan
- Nobody freaking wanted to take balotelli in their team
- His team was fed up with him
- His wages are likely to be massive


Isla, Padoin, Peluso ?

- Peluso is not an obligatory buy, he wont come.
- Padoin has been doing great as a stand in for Licht, and is a reliable stand in. I wish we had an equivalent for the left.
- Isla cannot be rated this season but the next
- They cost nearly nothing on wages


The author ?

- Stupid deluded fuck that can spew 4 columns of crap while missing the point(s)
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
What about it?
nothing, i just assume he isnt mandatory purchase, like with borriello.

Why would we pay one mil for a player we'd get later ? if its mandatory, i expect marotta to negotiate a much smaller fee, cause he'd want to make the portion booked next summer (the remaining fee) as close to 100% as possible
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Here is food for thought with the Balotelli for 20m and our 3 Bench players for 30m argument:

Will the 3 players that cost us 30m give us as much in services as Balotelli for 20m will to Milan?


I doubt it. The argument is valid. In this case, Milan did better business.

- - - Updated - - -

3.8mln/year I think.
That's it??

We paid amaur 2.5m and straight line 1.5m and look where that got us.


My god. :sergio:

- - - Updated - - -

His starting price was 37mil, they got him for 20, now why would that be ?


Perhaps because

- He only wanted to go to milan
- Nobody freaking wanted to take balotelli in their team
- His team was fed up with him
- His wages are likely to be massive


Isla, Padoin, Peluso ?

- Peluso is not an obligatory buy, he wont come.
- Padoin has been doing great as a stand in for Licht, and is a reliable stand in. I wish we had an equivalent for the left.
- Isla cannot be rated this season but the next
- They cost nearly nothing on wages


The author ?

- Stupid deluded fuck that can spew 4 columns of crap while missing the point(s)
Are you ever wrong?

You accuse a lot of people for being idiots and stupid.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 81)