Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
No Drogba, no Llorente, not even Immobile?:howler:
Marotta once again oozes of incompetence and sets new handicaps in Conte's path.
One more transfer window marked by failures and the inability to give us what we want.

If Conte again manages to overcome the odds, it would be a disgrace to give any credit to Marotta, as he has once again FAILED miserably...
 

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
'Following our instinct not a trend. Go against the grain until the end'

@Jem83 Even though I am not in it, can I suggest this as the society's slogan/motto?

bonus points if you know where it's from :D
 

v1rtu4l

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2008
6,349
No Drogba, no Llorente, not even Immobile?:howler:
Marotta once again oozes of incompetence and sets new handicaps in Conte's path.
One more transfer window marked by failures and the inability to give us what we want.
if it ends in the scudetto like last time, he may fail even many times more
 

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
No Drogba, no Llorente, not even Immobile?:howler:
Marotta once again oozes of incompetence and sets new handicaps in Conte's path.
One more transfer window marked by failures and the inability to give us what we want.

If Conte again manages to overcome the odds, it would be a disgrace to give any credit to Marotta, as he has once again FAILED miserably...
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
if it ends in the scudetto like last time, he may fail even many times more
How it ends, depends on Conte and the players, Marotta's job is done when the transfer window closes.

For ex, if gets us Messi and we fail to win anything, it wont mean that he didnt do a great job.
But if he fails again to bring us the finisher we need, he has failed, regardless if the Conte's and player's efforts manage to compensate for Marotta's incompetence or not!

If you only rate him about how it ends, then after 2 seasons in #7, Marotta is worse than Secco, which obviously isnt the case!
Learn to rate ppl, for their work and not by irrelevant or random incidents.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 88)