Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
A finisher? I thought Boriello was sort of spectacle maker SS.
actually he is useless both ways, he will try to contribute both to finishing and spectacle (practically any offensive player contributes to spectacle, esp the forwards) but they advertised him as a prolific forward, so i m pleased, as they realize and reckon our prime need, over pure spectacle maker.
So even if Boriello fails both as a spectacle man and as a goal machine, the need to buy a prolific finisher will remain.
I consider this a massive step forward, thinking of the future (as we are fine anyway for now)

---------- Post added at 21:49 ---------- Previous post was at 21:47 ----------

Still looks stupid when demanding foreign players.
only because we have tried pretty much everything the Italians have on the defensive department and it just sucks.
Being non Italian, increases our chances to find a decent one, or at least not overpay much for him.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,086
Caceres good. Getting rid of Amauri, good. Motta and Iaquinta, how much are we still paying? If we're still paying their salaries then there its still shit since we're technically paying other teams to have our players.

Borriello and Padoin, no.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 75)