Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
So far we can rate each transfer by itself

Pazienza: 1 Totally unnecessary no matter how you look at it.
Pepe: 0 No one in his right mind buys an amateur to play football on a high level
Motta: 0 No one in his right mind buys a goat to play football
Pirlo: 8 I still can't believe he is a Juve player, he still has it but he has to stay healthy and deployed right. As one pole in a 4-4-2 he is bound to fail
Vidal: 7 If he was bought to play as a left winger then change this to 3
Vucinic: 7 Not the best option out there
Lichtsteiner: 8 Probably with Pirlo he is the best purchase
Ziegler: 6 We could have done better in that position

Melo 0: You simply don't loan out one of your best players
Sissoko 8: Well done there

Did I forget anything? If Giaccherini is confirmed then give him a 0
Well said Jack, well said, i really like this new Jack, it reminds of the old one.
Finally a balanced, objective opinion, smth constructive, smth one can argue/reason/learn with/from it, i hope this is the end of the one liner posts of mockery, era!
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,915
I just don't get how he has the balls to publicly state that we want a player like Aguero and Benzema only to end up signing Vucinic. What is he thinking, people will not remember?
Weak minded people will also forgive as many have stated that if we finish 5th or better then this mercato is a success. The thinking of certain members here is seriously compartmental.
 

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
Weak minded people will also forgive as many have stated that if we finish 5th or better then this mercato is a success. The thinking of certain members here is seriously compartmental.
If we don't get CL, it's a failure, nothing less is acceptable, anybody tha would term anything lower than 3rd a success can eat a fat one.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,984
I just don't get how he has the balls to publicly state that we want a player like Aguero and Benzema only to end up signing Vucinic. What is he thinking, people will not remember?
What is your gripe, that he didn't sign a big name (for big money) or that he mentioned them?
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,984
That he mentioned them then didn't sign them.
Seeing how Marotta's mind works, I wouldn't be surprised if he thinks Vucinic is a better signing, or as good. Not that I agree, the player isn't really my type (talented, inconsistent). I would like to know how this would be justified, what Vucinic will have to do.

Signing big names for big money for me personally means nothing, it's important to others but I'm only interested in the team overall. I don't think it's impossible to do well for less, although I'm not convinced on the player chosen or the methods Marotta uses. Does he have any other methods? I don't think he does, he won't pay a lot for anyone. That's ok in principal, but he lives and dies by team results.
 

fredrik

Senior Member
Aug 7, 2011
7,239
That he mentioned them then didn't sign them.
who in the world would be able to sign those players to juve? he tried and failed, dont think another sporting director would mean we could get them. we could ofcourse pay aguero 10m a year in wages, but dont think that would benefit the team.
 

WΏΏdy?

Senior Member
Dec 23, 2005
14,997
This is bullshit,everything about this man is so fucking annoying. I was really hoping instead of his bold claim that he made will sitting balls out on the couch of the handsome reported who was banging him "we will sign another 2 players,might as well add a third" was false and he might sign just ONE FUCKING QUALITY PLAYER....

This aint you daughter's gangbang party you fucking slut,we dont need three fucking medicocre players to play in the wrong positions,maybe you and you blad daughter likes it in the wrong positions but you are not managing either right now.

Man! someone swing a bat at this guy's balls.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 50)