No, your insiders imformations which are very reliable. The WC cleaner of the Juve headquaters is your friend and told you very accurate transfer news always when his shift ends ,so you are ultra well inforrmed by that source .
Think whatever you like.I said previously ,"if that sites are lying I am lying also".Do I need to repeat that million times?At least I have a sources,bullshit or reliable they are sources.On what ground you make your position?On that trusty insider ? Claiming that 99% of the reports of FI are false because you think so ?So why then you read them ,otherwise you won't know what they are writing? I repeat think what you want.I said what I wanted to say about this issue.Obviously you are trolling and insulting.Go ahead .I don't give a fuck.
I am waiting yours about medical matters."The difference between muscular and ligament injury", author mighty medical expert Zacheryah.Anyway I am not reading Goal.com.Maybe you did.That's where your relevant conclusions came from.
Bottomline is: it's ridiculous to diss every newspaper heeadline specially one that's not far from the truth (eg there has been a precedence of us folloing players in the same price range).
There definitely was truth in us trying to sign say Jovetic or Van Persie, and Sanchez definitely fits that criteria of players where I believe we inquired about him and made those offers.
Now if some here want to not believe it fine, but laughing at others...
True, there is sometimes truth to what they write, especially when GMs come out and speak about players. What's more ridiculous is pretending we know any financial details, which I believe is the crux of this argument.
Saying we know what players are available for is absolute rubbish, unless stated by the selling club/in a contract.
Think whatever you like.I said previously ,"if that sites are lying I am lying also".Do I need to repeat that million times?At least I have a sources,bullshit or reliable they are sources.On what ground you make your position?On that trusty insider ? Claiming that 99% of the reports of FI are false because you think so ?So why then you read them ,otherwise you won't know what they are writing? I repeat think what you want.I said what I wanted to say about this issue.Obviously you are trolling and insulting.Go ahead .I don't give a fuck.
I read these occasionally, but the difference here is that I do that for amusement purposes, not something I'd use in an argument and especially financial details, that only very few people would know. These are rarely public.
True, there is sometimes truth to what they write, especially when GMs come out and speak about players. What's more ridiculous is pretending we know any financial details, which I believe is the crux of this argument.
Saying we know what players are available for is absolute rubbish, unless stated by the selling club/in a contract.
Iturbe case is a good example. Some info regarding financials leaked to the press and Marotta confirmed our interest at that time. GDM, one of the reliable journalists was covering that as well.
Tuttosport on the other hand reports alleged phone calls and even worse the transcript of these calls. Iirc that 18m bid speculation came from them.
I see Zach is still going on about Chile ruining Vidal's knee, even though we played him injured before they did against Sassuolo when the league was already secured.
No, your insiders imformations which are very reliable. The WC cleaner of the Juve headquaters is your friend and told you very accurate transfer news always when his shift ends ,so you are ultra well inforrmed by that source .