Gianluigi Donnarumma - GK - AC Milan (42 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,921
this
i don't mind if we get Donnarumma
but that doesn't mean we will have first option over haaland
Mino is a jerk sometimes for his fee, but he cares much about his client future too. I believe that if a club gives his client a reasonable wage and starting XI guarantee, and if that player willing to go there, he will go there.
If Mino is so good to convince a player to go to a certain club which Mino wish or wants, why the fuck he can't move bernard ass out from juve?
That’s fiduciary duty of every agent. Mino might be the best at achieving it for his clients.

To answer your second question, I think Mino knows that Berna is trash and he would not be able to secure a wage and corresponding fee from another club. He convinced Juventus on the next Italian savior and as usual we overpaid for trash.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
64,727
That’s fiduciary duty of every agent. Mino might be the best at achieving it for his clients.

To answer your second question, I think Mino knows that Berna is trash and he would not be able to secure a wage and corresponding fee from another club. He convinced Juventus on the next Italian savior and as usual we overpaid for trash.
He wasn't his agent when we signed him iirc.
 

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
He won't want to come
Most likely not I agree.

But that's why I said you have to put yourself in a position to be in the conversation at least. If we're talking about getting the next Ronaldo earlier than his 30s then this is the best opportunity we will ever have.

There is a lot of uncertainty now with all teams. With Ronaldo and Messi's decline there is no more clear cut favorites in CL anymore. Win the Scudetto and hope for the best in CL. Then hopefully Raiola helps a bit too.
 

Albo

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2009
11,463
He's England bound. No way we'll be able to match the offered salaries.
Call me crazy , but i really think we have good chances to sign him , if we get on the right track (Be competitive again,top 5 clubs in the world).
He was close to us before , his agent is Raiola , he visited our stadium 3-4 years ago .
If we do well in chl this year and win scudetto , i really think we can sign the guy .
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Call me crazy , but i really think we have good chances to sign him , if we get on the right track (Be competitive again,top 5 clubs in the world).
He was close to us before , his agent is Raiola , he visited our stadium 3-4 years ago .
If we do well in chl this year and win scudetto , i really think we can sign the guy .
Financially it's possible, now we need to show that he has a chance to compete for the CL here. If we can do that and put up a good enough financial offer, he will consider us. Never underestimate Raiola, he knows he can sell him again for like 150M if he makes him come here
 

Albo

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2009
11,463
Financially it's possible, now we need to show that he has a chance to compete for the CL here. If we can do that and put up a good enough financial offer, he will consider us. Never underestimate Raiola, he knows he can sell him again for like 150M if he makes him come here
having good relations with Raiola is good thing for the club , i don't get the hate for Raiolas tax , i would rather pay him 20-30m fee and get guys like (Pogba,De Ligt,Donnaruma,Haaland)
 
Last edited:

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,046
I mean if we can "afford" €60M/year on one player, surely we can split that three ways and actually have a good team again I would think/hope.
And that's the thing: we can't. We're broke af atm.

But I see many continue dreaming here while City, PSG, Man U, etc. will all easily pay 10 million more than us. With or without preferencial tax laws (who are possibly going out the door).
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
And that's the thing: we can't. We're broke af atm.

But I see many continue dreaming here while City, PSG, Man U, etc. will all easily pay 10 million more than us. With or without preferencial tax laws (who are possibly going out the door).
That's speculation, and even if they agree to it within the next year, it won't be effective immediately.

And we offered 30M to Ronaldo, without the new tax law, something no one else is willing. Don't see why it would be a problem for a Haaland. 25M is still like if we give Dybala 15M (which we would if he was on that level)
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,046
That's speculation, and even if they agree to it within the next year, it won't be effective immediately.

And we offered 30M to Ronaldo, without the new tax law, something no one else is willing. Don't see why it would be a problem for a Haaland. 25M is still like if we give Dybala 15M (which we would if he was on that level)
Because the Ronaldo operation was a very obvious financial disaster... Of course COVID played a big part but recovering by next season is next to nearly impossible.

And even if we could pay 25 million, those others will be able to pay 35. So it's not matching his demands, it's matching the other teams offers because his demands will depend on those offers.
 
Last edited:

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Because the Ronaldo operation was a very obvious financial disaster... Of course COVID played a big part but recovering by next season is next to nearly impossible.

And even if we could pay 25 million, those others will be able to pay 35. So it's not matching his demands, it's matching the other teams offers because his demands will depend on those offers.
I keep telling you, whatever they pay, the same amount is much cheaper for us. With Ronaldo we showed willingness to splash big for top of the world talent, and he was 33. I see no reason it won't be the case with Haaland
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 41)