It's going to be free to play, so obviously there will be heaps of DLC and 'pay 2 win'.
Check out World In Conflict, a bit old now but still a great game.
Meh, EA totally isnt getting what DLC was supposed to be.
Bring out a game, full price, and within the next couple of months, bring a big new content to download for money. Like an expansion. Yes, i''ll pay for it.
Create an open world (or sort off), and put a great story in it. Later, revisit the world with an entire new story (GTA 4->bikers->gay tony)
Not this "hey lets charge a full game, then remove shit and add day 1 dlc cause why the fuck not, make the day 1 dlc incredibly overrating/cheating, and later add wiorthless dlc.
C&C this way... its just wrong.
I had the most fun with older c&c's, because i did each campaign, then figured out who i preferred in LAN.
- - - Updated - - -
It's going to be free to play, so obviously there will be heaps of DLC and 'pay 2 win'.
Check out World In Conflict, a bit old now but still a great game.
Oh, yeah, great game, shame on me for forgetting about it
As a console shooter gamer, I have to say Zach is totally right about FPS scene, it's just so dumbed down and watered down yearly BS, every Dev tries to do dumb Cod clones to cater to numbnuts generation that been conditioned by that series. Anything that tries to anything half different from that is doomed to fail, or just be niche cult game at best.
Nail on the head. Its such a shame.
it may sound silly, but i miss times, when i actually had to think what to do, or how. Nowadays, playing games on the highest difficulty level doesnt even guarantee it to be very challenging.
Unless dark souls. THAT game is genuinly hard.