Let's recapitulate.
1. You claim that the holocaust is purposely exaggerated by "Zionists" to legitimize their actions.
2. Buck states that there is plenty of evidence to suggest that the numbers of casualties are not amplified.
3. You dismiss his statement by using the "vilifying the source" fallacy, by claiming that his sources are biased.
4. You don't provide sources for your own claim, which is already fallacious. Therefore, you are using the blanket statement fallacy.
5. I ask for your sources since you didn't support any claim with evidence, which is a very normal thing to do in an argument.
6. You reject the validity of discussing with me on charges that I am brainwashed, which is yet another logical fallacy, the "ad hominem" fallacy.
You have used three logical fallacies in five posts, you are really surpassing yourself.
Please continue, this is getting amusing.