Gay Adoption (5 Viewers)

[Salvo]

What about em? if by single dads you mean the fathers who are taking care of their own blood then there is no question of adoption. That's the child's own father so i think he will probably end up taking better care of him than a gay couple.

How?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[JCK]

That's just me. A man fucking another man sickens me. Lesbian sex is also not fine Jack.

I can't convice you but that comes from my belief.

So lesbian sex is not fine but it does not sicken you. That's at least a good first step to stop being such a homosexuality hater.

 

[Kate]

That's not what i mean,of course there are cases where the biological parents have abused their own children. I am good with a single father giving away his child to his relatives where a proper couple can take care of them,but not a gay couple.

I'd rather have the child go to an unrelated heterosexual couple. It should not be seen as a ego war between the rights of the homosexuals and the govt. A child needs a mother, period.

A child can't always have a mother, and that does not mean we should be disregarding stable, loving homes just because of the sex and orientation of the parents. There are far too many children in need out there.

 

[Cheesio]

So lesbian sex is not fine but it does not sicken you. That's at least a good first step to stop being such a homosexuality hater.

I'm not a hater. I'don't care about it. That's my stance. Everyone is entiteld to do what he wants when it's not affecting me.

 

[Preet]

A child can't always have a mother, and that does not mean we should be disregarding stable, loving homes just because of the sex and orientation of the parents. There are far too many children in need out there.

There are. But the orphans are not in question,its the children with single fathers

 

[Kate]

There are. But the orphans are not in question,its the children with single fathers

By gay couple are you referring to only homosexual males? What about a gay female couple?

 

[Preet]

By gay couple are you referring to only homosexual males? What about a gay female couple?

Heterosexual couple>single mother with his own child>single father with his own child>gay female couple>gay male couple

 

[Kate]

Heterosexual couple>single mother with his own child>single father with his own child>gay female couple>gay male couple

I have no issue with your ranking, but they should still be allowed to be used as a viable option, yes?

 

[JCK]

I'm not a hater. I'don't care about it. That's my stance. Everyone is entiteld to do what he wants when it's not affecting me.

So why would it affect you if a gay couple adopt a child?

 

[Salvo]

Heterosexual couple>single mother with his own child>single father with his own child>gay female couple>gay male couple

Where does a hetero couple that adopts go? Why are the female couple better than the male couple?

 

[Preet]

I have no issue with your ranking, but they should still be allowed to be used as a viable option, yes?

Of course! but definitely the last option
Only problem is most of the people jump the gun in favour of gay couples because they make it a battle between human rights and the "evil" govt.

 

[Kate]

Of course! but definitely the last option
Only problem is most of the people jump the gun in favour of gay couples because they make it a battle between human rights and the "evil" govt.

I have calmed down a bit, then. Your original post said that they should not be allowed at all, and that is the big evil to me.

 

[Salvo]

Of course! but definitely the last option
Only problem is most of the people jump the gun in favour of gay couples because they make it a battle between human rights and the "evil" govt.

Cut out the evil part and it is.

 

[Preet]

Where does a hetero couple that adopts go?

The same as the original heterosexual parents.

Why are the female couple better than the male couple?

Because instinctively females take better care of a child and a child needs the mother more.

 

[Salvo]

So wait your claiming that a gay couple wont take care of a child as well as a Hetero couple that have physically had a kid because the gay couple are not blood related to the child? But when it comes to a hetero couple that have adopted a child they will despite no blood relation?

 

[JCK]

The same as the original heterosexual parents.



Because instinctively females take better care of a child and a child needs the mother more.

Says who?

 

[Preet]

I have calmed down a bit, then. Your original post said that they should not be allowed at all, and that is the big evil to me.

TBH that's what it is really. They come last in the pecking order and if everyone in the queue befo them adopts a child then the gay couples (men) won't have anything left to adopt

I would also like a child to wait another couple of years to try and find a family with a mother and a father instead of being adopted by a gay couple now (even if it means missing out on a family
for 2 years)

 

[IliveForJuve]

I'd rather be adopted by a healthy gay couple than by a junkie hetero couple.

 

[Salvo]

Please answer my question I am very curious and I also think your theory of mothers being better parents is very dated.

Also claiming a child should wait is ridiculous.

 

[Klin]

Does heterosexual sex with preventive means have a point?

What does that have to do with what I was saying?