Gay Adoption (6 Viewers)

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,691
15 years old scientific evidence? And I also posted a study from 2008 that says otherwise.
I can give you a study from 2010. You just have to ask.

I cannot say that they definitely are, but I can say that I imagine it is highly likely, given the studies I have read and what has been researched and proven. And that is what I am saying.
You imagine, I imagine, we can all imagine Kate. It's highly likely that God doesn't exist no? And to some God exists for sure. There you go we have two different logic there but I'll chose to go with the unproved one and the one with no evidence;) It only makes sense.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Cheesio

**********
Jul 11, 2006
22,514
ßöмßäяðîëя;3253907 said:
Well the poor are born poor....

The blacks are born black...

Oh, and rape is about power, nothing else, especially not about sex.
" Skin color and other genetic traits can be traced through inheritance patterns and simple Mendelian genetics. Homosexuals are identified not by a trait or a gene, but rather by their actions. Without the action, they would be indistinguishable from all other people. It is only when they alter their behavior that they become a group that is recognized as being different "
 

AndreaCristiano

Nato, Vive, e muore Italiano
Jun 9, 2011
19,467
" Skin color and other genetic traits can be traced through inheritance patterns and simple Mendelian genetics. Homosexuals are identified not by a trait or a gene, but rather by their actions. Without the action, they would be indistinguishable from all other people. It is only when they alter their behavior that they become a group that is recognized as being different "
Can't actually argue with that point
 

Kate

Moderator
Feb 7, 2011
18,598
I can give you a study from 2010. You just have to ask.



You imagine, I imagine, we can all imagine Kate. It's highly likely that God doesn't exist no? And to some God exists for sure. There you go we have two different logic there but I'll chose to go with the unproved one and the one with no evidence;) It only makes sense.
Oh that's an entirely different can of worms that I don't want to open here.

But from the studies I have read, the evidence linking biology to homosexuality is the much stronger argument, and so that is the one I am going with. If something comes out one day that honestly proves me wrong, then I will have to go with that one.

AndreaCristiano said:
" Skin color and other genetic traits can be traced through inheritance patterns and simple Mendelian genetics. Homosexuals are identified not by a trait or a gene, but rather by their actions. Without the action, they would be indistinguishable from all other people. It is only when they alter their behavior that they become a group that is recognized as being different "
What is making them alter their behaviour, though?
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
88,238
Whether or not there is a gay gene it's already been proven that homosexuals have noticeably different brain chemistry and hormone levels. Studies with human pheromones have also proven that their brains react differently to that kind of stimulation.

Whether or not you agree that homosexuality is something people or born into or not there are documented organic differences. That much is undeniable.
" Skin color and other genetic traits can be traced through inheritance patterns and simple Mendelian genetics. Homosexuals are identified not by a trait or a gene, but rather by their actions. Without the action, they would be indistinguishable from all other people. It is only when they alter their behavior that they become a group that is recognized as being different "
I already went over this ^
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,164
I have said even in our religous disscussions in the end it comes down to belief and what you accept as proof.
Well, that's just the point, there is no proof, in religious discussions as in this... THAT'S YOUR POINT!
Watch it, I don't like it when guys I don't like insult guys I do...
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,691
Oh that's an entirely different can of worms that I don't want to open here.

But from the studies I have read, the evidence linking biology to homosexuality is the much stronger argument, and so that is the one I am going with. If something comes out one day that honestly proves me wrong, then I will have to go with that one.
You go with it, it's your choice and your right, but you can't try to convince others or point out that they're wrong when you don't have a fact proof but only a stronger argument in your thoughts.

Fine, we wont open another can of worms :D
 

Kate

Moderator
Feb 7, 2011
18,598
You go with it, it's your choice and your right, but you can't try to convince others that they're wrong when you don't have a fact proof.

Fine, we wont open another can of worms :D
Of course I can, that is what a debate is. And I do have proof that there is a strong case for genetics being involved in homosexuality. And I already posted them.
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,164
" Skin color and other genetic traits can be traced through inheritance patterns and simple Mendelian genetics. Homosexuals are identified not by a trait or a gene, but rather by their actions. Without the action, they would be indistinguishable from all other people. It is only when they alter their behavior that they become a group that is recognized as being different "
:lol:

Like a gang.

WATCH OUT!

IT'S THAT TERRIBLE GANG OVER THERE, THEY COME IN OUR HOUSES AND FUCK EACH OTHER IN THE ASS!

IT'S THE FAGGOTS!
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,691
Of course I can, that is what a debate is. And I do have proof that there is a strong case for genetics being involved in homosexuality. And I already posted them.
Genetics being involved is something and people are born homosexuals is something else.

I can post more links but this time the 2010 ones or else it will piss off Zlatan :D
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)