Gaetano D'Agostino (21 Viewers)

Is D'Agostino to Juventus a good move?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

only-juve

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2008
7,451
Can't we sell all those unwanted players that we have (and we have plenty of those guys) spend the next few months doing that and then return at the end of the summer and offer Udinese that extra cash they want (maybe less) and they'll most likely take that offer.

If they won't i think we can manage with the players that we have right now.......
 

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,652
We already have Camo-Momo-Marchisio-Diego as potential starters. D'Agostino would add depth to the squad and we don't need to spend crazy money for him. We already have one of Tiago/Poulsen and Zanetti as backups so there's no rush.

If Cigarini was available he could of been a nice choice for the bench.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,086
You've got to be kidding... right? Maybe I'm not picking up the sarcasm?

You want to let Seba go, before he's even had the opportunity to play for a coach who has confidence in his ability? Hell no. We need to give this talented player a legitimate shot!
If they had confidence in his ability they wouldn't go for the 4-3-1-2 formation. For me Giovinco should be a starter, he is to good for the bench. But since we are going to play the stupid 4-3-1-2 Diego is obviously going to play behind the strikers and Giovinco is going to rot on the bench and never get the chance to play regularly. The only thing Juve can offer Giovinco in the 4-3-1-2 formation is a reserve spot for when Diego is out and maby a few games in the Coppa Italia but that is not good enough. In Udinese he would be their star player and play every game which is vital for Giovinco at these stage of his career. He should get the chance to play on a regular basis.

Either we change formation to 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1 and trust in him completely or we send him on loan to Udinese cuz the bench is not good enough for such an amazing player.

But I feel sorry for the guy. He is so loyal and he never goes to the media and complains about his situation. But at the end of the day, if this goes on and he never get the chance to play regularly he is going to end up asking to leave the club by himself, and really, who can blame him?
 

RavaneVialli

Senior Member
Jan 27, 2008
863
If they had confidence in his ability they wouldn't go for the 4-3-1-2 formation. For me Giovinco should be a starter, he is to good for the bench. But since we are going to play the stupid 4-3-1-2 Diego is obviously going to play behind the strikers and Giovinco is going to rot on the bench and never get the chance to play regularly. The only thing Juve can offer Giovinco in the 4-3-1-2 formation is a reserve spot for when Diego is out and maby a few games in the Coppa Italia but that is not good enough. In Udinese he would be their star player and play every game which is vital for Giovinco at these stage of his career. He should get the chance to play on a regular basis.

Either we change formation to 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1 and trust in him completely or we send him on loan to Udinese cuz the bench is not good enough for such an amazing player.

But I feel sorry for the guy. He is so loyal and he never goes to the media and complains about his situation. But at the end of the day, if this goes on and he never get the chance to play regularly he is going to end up asking to leave the club by himself, and really, who can blame him?
Ciro said our formation will be flexible, so stop whining before the season even starts FFS.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
Now that Secco just confirmed that we are going for the 4-3-1-2 formation next season we should just give them Giovinco. I dont see the point of us having one of the best talents out there and make him sit on the bench and maby if he is lucky Ferrara will play him in the 80th minute or so. We are just destroying him and he would get to play regularly in Udinese. At least we are going to be using D'Ago on the field.
please repeat this post another 10 times.

apparently people at Juventuz have a short memory and the first 200 times you said the same silly thing were not enough.
 

abejaa

Senior Member
Sep 25, 2006
1,665
If they had confidence in his ability they wouldn't go for the 4-3-1-2 formation. For me Giovinco should be a starter, he is to good for the bench. But since we are going to play the stupid 4-3-1-2 Diego is obviously going to play behind the strikers and Giovinco is going to rot on the bench and never get the chance to play regularly. The only thing Juve can offer Giovinco in the 4-3-1-2 formation is a reserve spot for when Diego is out and maby a few games in the Coppa Italia but that is not good enough. In Udinese he would be their star player and play every game which is vital for Giovinco at these stage of his career. He should get the chance to play on a regular basis.

Either we change formation to 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1 and trust in him completely or we send him on loan to Udinese cuz the bench is not good enough for such an amazing player.

But I feel sorry for the guy. He is so loyal and he never goes to the media and complains about his situation. But at the end of the day, if this goes on and he never get the chance to play regularly he is going to end up asking to leave the club by himself, and really, who can blame him?
I hope he is not gonna be Thiery Anry, a flop in Juventus and star in any other team in the world!!!!
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,773
Almiron II.

My money we will offload him on loan to Lazio next January if we sign him this summer.
D'Agostino is no Almiron II. Ledesma on the other hand...

Would definitely be worth NOT acquiring additional players that we have to unload at a discount later. Ledesma would fit that category in my book.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 16)