[FML] Serie A 2009/2010 (37 Viewers)
- Thread starter Azzurri7
- Start date
So three people who watched the match (I didn't watch it) say it was very soft and you, again, say it was a correct decision.
I know why are you doing this.
P.S: And no, it's not because Hoori likes Milan. It's because she doesn't want to admit that she was wrong when she argued with my opinion that Milan are getting more calls than anyone else in Italy. After that everytime Milan get a very soft penalty or a dubious goal, and everyone says so, she is always the only one arguing against it and she always sees correct decisions.
According to Hoori the refs on Milan matches turn out to be the best refs in the world and they always make correct decisions.
I know why are you doing this.
P.S: And no, it's not because Hoori likes Milan. It's because she doesn't want to admit that she was wrong when she argued with my opinion that Milan are getting more calls than anyone else in Italy. After that everytime Milan get a very soft penalty or a dubious goal, and everyone says so, she is always the only one arguing against it and she always sees correct decisions.
According to Hoori the refs on Milan matches turn out to be the best refs in the world and they always make correct decisions.
So three people who watched the match (I didn't watch it) say it was very soft and you, again, say it was a correct decision.
I know why are you doing this.
P.S: And no, it's not because Hoori likes Milan. It's because she doesn't want to admit that she was wrong when she argued with my opinion that Milan are getting more calls than anyone else in Italy. After that everytime Milan get a very soft penalty or a dubious goal, and everyone says so, she is always the only one arguing against it and she always sees correct decisions.
According to Hoori the refs on Milan matches turn out to be the best refs in the world and they always make correct decisions.
I know why are you doing this.
P.S: And no, it's not because Hoori likes Milan. It's because she doesn't want to admit that she was wrong when she argued with my opinion that Milan are getting more calls than anyone else in Italy. After that everytime Milan get a very soft penalty or a dubious goal, and everyone says so, she is always the only one arguing against it and she always sees correct decisions.
According to Hoori the refs on Milan matches turn out to be the best refs in the world and they always make correct decisions.
First of all guys, Lazio are far from save from relegation if they lose tonight.
Much depends on Atalanta-Bologna. They play in the afternoon and the result of that match will make Lazio's match against Inter either a training one or a very important one.
These are the standings:
16. Lazio 40
17. Bologna 39
18. Atalanta 34
19. Siena 30
20. Livorno 29
If Atalanta lose today then Lazio will have nothing to play for. They still won't be 100% secure because Atalanta has a better h2h, but still 6 pts with 2 matches left will be more than enough.
If Atalanta and Bologna draw today, then again Lazio can allow a defeat. But if Atalanta wins the things will look like this:
16. Lazio 40
17. Bologna 39
18. Atalanta 37
Then it might be tricky for Lazio, even if their last two matches aren't tough (away to relegated Livorno and home with Udinese). Like I said, in case both Lazio and Atalanta have the same number of pts then Atalanta are better, so if Atalanta win today then Lazio will have everything to play for against Inter later tonight.
Much depends on Atalanta-Bologna. They play in the afternoon and the result of that match will make Lazio's match against Inter either a training one or a very important one.
These are the standings:
16. Lazio 40
17. Bologna 39
18. Atalanta 34
19. Siena 30
20. Livorno 29
If Atalanta lose today then Lazio will have nothing to play for. They still won't be 100% secure because Atalanta has a better h2h, but still 6 pts with 2 matches left will be more than enough.
If Atalanta and Bologna draw today, then again Lazio can allow a defeat. But if Atalanta wins the things will look like this:
16. Lazio 40
17. Bologna 39
18. Atalanta 37
Then it might be tricky for Lazio, even if their last two matches aren't tough (away to relegated Livorno and home with Udinese). Like I said, in case both Lazio and Atalanta have the same number of pts then Atalanta are better, so if Atalanta win today then Lazio will have everything to play for against Inter later tonight.
So three people who watched the match (I didn't watch it) say it was very soft and you, again, say it was a correct decision.
I know why are you doing this.
P.S: And no, it's not because Hoori likes Milan. It's because she doesn't want to admit that she was wrong when she argued with my opinion that Milan are getting more calls than anyone else in Italy. After that everytime Milan get a very soft penalty or a dubious goal, and everyone says so, she is always the only one arguing against it and she always sees correct decisions.
According to Hoori the refs on Milan matches turn out to be the best refs in the world and they always make correct decisions.
I know why are you doing this.
P.S: And no, it's not because Hoori likes Milan. It's because she doesn't want to admit that she was wrong when she argued with my opinion that Milan are getting more calls than anyone else in Italy. After that everytime Milan get a very soft penalty or a dubious goal, and everyone says so, she is always the only one arguing against it and she always sees correct decisions.
According to Hoori the refs on Milan matches turn out to be the best refs in the world and they always make correct decisions.
It is just very biased of you Alen. When I first saw the incident I thought it was a wrong decision but looking at the replays, Krøldrup fouled Borriello. Only biased viewers like you can't see that. And here, I think my word is more reliable than yours because I'm a neutral viewer while you are a blind one when it comes to Milan
No, but this is a different case. You call me biased but in this case you're just as biased. This isn't one call, one penalty for Milan against Fiorentina.
Actually, in this case you turn out to be even more biased. I didn't doubt some of the penalties Milan got because they were correct decisions, imo. But for every single call they got that I or others called dubious, you call it a good call, even if when I checked the Milan forums many Milan fans called it a very soft or inexistent penalty or an offside goal.
You see, if you admit that some call Milan get is dubious, it won't mean that you were wrong when you argued with me that Milan are the most favored team in the league.
But for some reason you defended the last 10-15 calls Milan got and people questioned.
Actually, in this case you turn out to be even more biased. I didn't doubt some of the penalties Milan got because they were correct decisions, imo. But for every single call they got that I or others called dubious, you call it a good call, even if when I checked the Milan forums many Milan fans called it a very soft or inexistent penalty or an offside goal.
You see, if you admit that some call Milan get is dubious, it won't mean that you were wrong when you argued with me that Milan are the most favored team in the league.
But for some reason you defended the last 10-15 calls Milan got and people questioned.
This is just not true. I only got to watch some four or five Milan games this season, how can I defend every single call they got?
Some people were moaning about some very close offside calls and I said that you can't blame the linesman for not flagging at such incidents. I called them normal refereeing mistakes.
Some people were moaning about some very close offside calls and I said that you can't blame the linesman for not flagging at such incidents. I called them normal refereeing mistakes.
That happened on the same match where Milan got 3 penalties and scored an offside goal.
One of the penalties was correct, the offside was indeed a tough call. But the other two penalties (over Ambrosini I think) were tooooooo soft, I'll dare say inexistent (one was even outside the penalty area).
Yet when I said that you replied with "In your opinion they are soft penalties".
People were mentioning the offside goal as one of the many mistakes the refs made on that match, not as something the ref made on purpose so he could gift the win to Milan.
One of the penalties was correct, the offside was indeed a tough call. But the other two penalties (over Ambrosini I think) were tooooooo soft, I'll dare say inexistent (one was even outside the penalty area).
Yet when I said that you replied with "In your opinion they are soft penalties".
People were mentioning the offside goal as one of the many mistakes the refs made on that match, not as something the ref made on purpose so he could gift the win to Milan.