I know, it will be so hard to see this invisible player scoring goals for Inter when we could have got him for €5m. Imagine Hamsik, Sneijder, Milito, Eto'o and Balotelli in the same team backed up by Cambiasso, Motta, Mariga etc.
get over it with "we could have gotten him for peanuts" because back then none of you cried for him... and afterwards you're always smarter and if he went to juve he would not have played like giovinco so he might been crap here as well, because he got no chance to develop.
i gotta agree that my view of hamsik (in terms of not showing up) might not be sensible to you, because you only look for the players that score, but popping up once per game being in the right position to score a goal might be a great feat for a poacher, but i personally rate midfielders that work the whole game and are visible the whole time ... is trezeguet a good midfielder, because he could pop up once a few games and score a goal ?
if he was a midfielder that was working hard, he would have had far more assists than 3 whole season.
but i guess, thats the same view as the majority of the football fans ... players who score are the best (even when they suck at the other tasks that are demanded by them by the position they are playing).
as i already mentioned, i do not see many napoli matches, but the ones i saw it was not like the commentator was going "oh, and here is hamsik again with a good pass" or "hamsik again setting the defense under pressure" .. yeah he is scoring goals ... but apart from that he is not visible like ... for instance diego or other midfielders that do demand the ball and try to make things happen...
De Rossi

, no player is better than him at his position. Very few players are at his level but not better.
i am curious why you post that now, because in terms of shooting and passing he had a pretty bad game today ... already counted more than 5 easy misplaced passes
but yes ... in general form he is great