Filip Kostić (14 Viewers)

cimenk

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2008
3,011
Attack :
Yildiz
Vlahovic
Mbangula - CT
Milik
Conceicao
Nico Gonzales
Weah

Thuram
Koopmeiners
Locatelli - HG
Douglas Luiz
Fagioli - CT
Adzic
McKennie

Cambiaso - HG
Rouhi - CT
Cabal
Bremer
Gatti
Kalulu
Danilo
Savona - CT
Djalo

GK :
Di Gregorio - HG
Perin - HG
Pinsoglio - CT

25 Players With
4 players Club Training (CT), 4 players Homegrown (HG)
Maximum 17 player not homegrown or not club trained

This list is 26 players.
Can we register 26 players ?
If we include Djalo for Defense depth, it means 17 players for not homegrown / not club trained. Before this quota is for Sancho i suppose.

I dont see we can register Kostic if he want to stay and convince Motta. Minimum One between Kostic or Djalo should leave
 

ilmetronome

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2020
538
Attack :
Yildiz
Vlahovic
Mbangula - CT
Milik
Conceicao
Nico Gonzales
Weah

Thuram
Koopmeiners
Locatelli - HG
Douglas Luiz
Fagioli - CT
Adzic
McKennie

Cambiaso - HG
Rouhi - CT
Cabal
Bremer
Gatti
Kalulu
Danilo
Savona - CT
Djalo

GK :
Di Gregorio - HG
Perin - HG
Pinsoglio - CT

25 Players With
4 players Club Training (CT), 4 players Homegrown (HG)
Maximum 17 player not homegrown or not club trained

This list is 26 players.
Can we register 26 players ?
If we include Djalo for Defense depth, it means 17 players for not homegrown / not club trained. Before this quota is for Sancho i suppose.

I dont see we can register Kostic if he want to stay and convince Motta. Minimum One between Kostic or Djalo should leave
I think there are no limitation for u-21, so we can always register them in each match as u-21 player.
Yildiz can be registered as u-21 player, so we can register both Djalo and Kostic

In UCL U-21 player listed as B list
 

Rockets

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2022
3,366
Attack :
Yildiz
Vlahovic
Mbangula - CT
Milik
Conceicao
Nico Gonzales
Weah

Thuram
Koopmeiners
Locatelli - HG
Douglas Luiz
Fagioli - CT
Adzic
McKennie

Cambiaso - HG
Rouhi - CT
Cabal
Bremer
Gatti
Kalulu
Danilo
Savona - CT
Djalo

GK :
Di Gregorio - HG
Perin - HG
Pinsoglio - CT

25 Players With
4 players Club Training (CT), 4 players Homegrown (HG)
Maximum 17 player not homegrown or not club trained

This list is 26 players.
Can we register 26 players ?
If we include Djalo for Defense depth, it means 17 players for not homegrown / not club trained. Before this quota is for Sancho i suppose.

I dont see we can register Kostic if he want to stay and convince Motta. Minimum One between Kostic or Djalo should leave
Thanks for the list. But what about arthur?
 

cimenk

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2008
3,011
I think there are no limitation for u-21, so we can always register them in each match as u-21 player.
Yildiz can be registered as u-21 player, so we can register both Djalo and Kostic

In UCL U-21 player listed as B list
U-21 means below age 21 years players regardless homegrown serie a or clubtrained ?
So Adzic can also be considered as u-21 and not counted ?
If so, it's good news for both of them

Before i thought after we miss Sancho, Kostic will be registered in Sancho's place.
Djalo case is that Roma really screw us and Lens. First, they have interest with Djalo then they decide to sign Danso, then back to Djalo after they want to use fund to sign Manu Kone. Later they see Hermoso / Hummels still available as free agent and cancel to sign Djalo

- - - Updated - - -

Thanks for the list. But what about arthur?
I dont think he will be included, CM position is super full.
We will try to find solution on country that still have open transfer window : Saudi, Brazil, Portugal
 

Tak!

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2011
3,982
You think his agent is clueless for playing it out this way? That's insane
Agent had the chance to cash in, in the Saudis or receive a transfer bonus on shipping his client somewhere. The agent knows the client will not play anything the forthcoming year and will have to deal with that frustration and try to calm the client. Once the year has passed, most opportunities are gone. The client may receive some offers but there will be a huge wage drop and hardly any transfer bonus for the agent.

I can't find any positives for either party from this situation, so the agent must be clueless.
 

Bianconero_Aus

Beppe Marotta Is My God
May 26, 2009
78,311
He’s been given the #20

Doesn’t mean he still won’t leave as Saudi and Turkey transfer windows haven’t closed yet.

But apparently he is keen on trying to work his way back into the squad. I wouldn’t be totally against it.
 

cimenk

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2008
3,011
He’s been given the #20

Doesn’t mean he still won’t leave as Saudi and Turkey transfer windows haven’t closed yet.

But apparently he is keen on trying to work his way back into the squad. I wouldn’t be totally against it.
He probably think we need one more LW as we look for Sancho. As the deal failed, it means he can be that Sancho in LW for us. Yes, not totally against but still better to move than retain
 

RKid1

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2020
700
Agent had the chance to cash in, in the Saudis or receive a transfer bonus on shipping his client somewhere. The agent knows the client will not play anything the forthcoming year and will have to deal with that frustration and try to calm the client. Once the year has passed, most opportunities are gone. The client may receive some offers but there will be a huge wage drop and hardly any transfer bonus for the agent.

I can't find any positives for either party from this situation, so the agent must be clueless.
First of all, the Saudi option is still on the table --- and probably will be moving forward.

He was willing to go to Fiorentina, but the deal fell through. You don't look at the personal and intangible side of things. Why would he take a big pay cut so he could go to a club and country for the next 3-4 years that he doesnt want to go to? You're saying his offers wont be there in a few months. What were his options now? Southampton? Boy, how will he ever get over passing up that opportunity?

The reality is, the next club he goes to will probably be his last, and it will be a middle to bottom half of the table club at significantly less money. Why rush into that when you can collect a fat paycheck and put out feelers for the winter window.

If I were him, I'd be more than willing to collect my big fat paycheck and be patient. Assuming he wants to stay in Italy or return to Germany, something will open up. Probably a 6 month loan with Juve paying most of the wages.

This isn't just a Kostic & his agent fault. Juventus deserve blame for not finding him a club and solution as well. I'm sure at worst, there were loan opportunities available that could have saved Juve some money, which would be better than not saying anything.
 

Tak!

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2011
3,982
First of all, the Saudi option is still on the table --- and probably will be moving forward.

He was willing to go to Fiorentina, but the deal fell through. You don't look at the personal and intangible side of things. Why would he take a big pay cut so he could go to a club and country for the next 3-4 years that he doesnt want to go to? You're saying his offers wont be there in a few months. What were his options now? Southampton? Boy, how will he ever get over passing up that opportunity?

The reality is, the next club he goes to will probably be his last, and it will be a middle to bottom half of the table club at significantly less money. Why rush into that when you can collect a fat paycheck and put out feelers for the winter window.

If I were him, I'd be more than willing to collect my big fat paycheck and be patient. Assuming he wants to stay in Italy or return to Germany, something will open up. Probably a 6 month loan with Juve paying most of the wages.

This isn't just a Kostic & his agent fault. Juventus deserve blame for not finding him a club and solution as well. I'm sure at worst, there were loan opportunities available that could have saved Juve some money, which would be better than not saying anything.
If he would have left for Soto or somewhere else he would, perhaps, receive a smaller paycheck compared to what he has today. If he leaves a year from now that offer he had on the table will be significantly lower. He will be a year older with no one really knowing how well he can perform again. He can only dream of teams like Soto then. If he would have signed for Soto, with a pay reduction, he would cash in for a longer period of time and the total of that money would be higher than rotting on the bench here for another year.

Everyone is at fault here, I agree. But ultimately he and his agent did not take responsibility and own their path. They knew what would happen if they did not find a solution and now they face the consequences.

I hope Motta puts him in the freezer for a year and then Kostic can enjoy finding a club in 2 bundesliga. At best he can get some minutes as LB if there is an injury crisis, he would probably perform decently against bottom teams.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,048
He probably think we need one more LW as we look for Sancho. As the deal failed, it means he can be that Sancho in LW for us. Yes, not totally against but still better to move than retain
He's not a LW though, at tops at wingback. And he's defintely not a type of winger Motta wants. He's not going to play and if he does it will be if we have massive injuries on LB.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 9)