He can choose, if he still wants to play football in a smaller team like Amauri, or to keep showing "his worth" with Juve just like Iaquinta did and no team wants to take him.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Fabio Quagliarella (9 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Like Gio, I don't think Quag declared he's leaving in the summer, nor did the staff say he will be sold either. Also, I could be wrong about this, but I do think all 3 of the players were/are on the market. Not just Vucinic and Quag.
Like I said in the post above, when it's a loan, you have to look at it from the players perspective too (especially the ones above 30). You may move to another team where you still may not play as much, and then you may go on the market again in 5-6 months. That team is not commiting itself to the player. Especially since the majority of those teams were from overseas. I could understand if Quag didn't contribute to the cause at all or was always injured or didn't get along with his teammates, but there was nothing of the sort. Of course, there are some who'll point out to the Alessio incident, but then that was last season, and we only blocked his move even after that happened so it's a moot point as of today. The fact that the player wasn't allowed to move when he wanted, the club then pushing him to move without any stability (on loan) when it's convenient for them, means they should show consideration under the circumstances.
Like I said in the post above, when it's a loan, you have to look at it from the players perspective too (especially the ones above 30). You may move to another team where you still may not play as much, and then you may go on the market again in 5-6 months. That team is not commiting itself to the player. Especially since the majority of those teams were from overseas. I could understand if Quag didn't contribute to the cause at all or was always injured or didn't get along with his teammates, but there was nothing of the sort. Of course, there are some who'll point out to the Alessio incident, but then that was last season, and we only blocked his move even after that happened so it's a moot point as of today. The fact that the player wasn't allowed to move when he wanted, the club then pushing him to move without any stability (on loan) when it's convenient for them, means they should show consideration under the circumstances.
Juve wanted to get rid of Quag, they tried to help him to go into a good situation, he was being stubborn refusing everything to the point where Juve got pissed off and now he's having to face the consequences of his own actions. Under contract Juve are obligated to pay him the money but they are not obligated to use him. Juve transfer listed both him and Vucinic and while Vuci was trying to make things happen Quag was refusing and making himself difficult.
@ baggio
Dude, just stop.
-You said he accepted Lazio and Samp (in January) and we were the ones who did not let him go on loan.
Few hours later..
Both Tare and Samp's DS confirm that he rejected them.
And now even his agent confirms that we wanted to get rid of him even on loan.
-Doesn't get included in EL squad, must be because of homegrown rule.
Pepe who has been out for 2 years is there.
Non of your theories stand no more.
Dude, just stop.
-You said he accepted Lazio and Samp (in January) and we were the ones who did not let him go on loan.
Few hours later..
Both Tare and Samp's DS confirm that he rejected them.
And now even his agent confirms that we wanted to get rid of him even on loan.
-Doesn't get included in EL squad, must be because of homegrown rule.
Pepe who has been out for 2 years is there.
Non of your theories stand no more.
Look, it's pretty obvious by now that Juve don't have space for him. Other than putting him into a rocket and firing him to the Moon I don't know how else this can be made clearer.
Having said that I would also have kept Quagliarella for the EL. Personally I think the reasons for this are twofold; a personal decision because Quagliarella wouldn't move, and more importantly, it gives the chance for Giovinco to be showcased in the EL, and hopefully play well enough to either gain some form or attract enough attention to retain some value on the market (more the latter).
Having said that I would also have kept Quagliarella for the EL. Personally I think the reasons for this are twofold; a personal decision because Quagliarella wouldn't move, and more importantly, it gives the chance for Giovinco to be showcased in the EL, and hopefully play well enough to either gain some form or attract enough attention to retain some value on the market (more the latter).
@ baggio
Dude, just stop.
-You said he accepted Lazio and Samp (in January) and we were the ones who did not let him go on loan.
Few hours later..
Both Tare and Samp's DS confirm that he rejected them.
And now even his agent confirms that we wanted to get rid of him even on loan.
-Doesn't get included in EL squad, must be because of homegrown rule.
Pepe who has been out for 2 years is there.
Non of your theories stand no more.
Dude, just stop.
-You said he accepted Lazio and Samp (in January) and we were the ones who did not let him go on loan.
Few hours later..
Both Tare and Samp's DS confirm that he rejected them.
And now even his agent confirms that we wanted to get rid of him even on loan.
-Doesn't get included in EL squad, must be because of homegrown rule.
Pepe who has been out for 2 years is there.
Non of your theories stand no more.
Everyone had the sources that said different things. Including that Quag had agreed a move to Lazio and wanted Samp but they couldn't afford his salary and so it didn't work out. Eventually it turns out that the argument worked both ways coz he did reject mid season moves but seemingly agreed for a move end of season. It's not my theories.
Just like last mercato when I said that Conte blocked the move, and you scoffed at that suggestion. I don't say stuff to make things up so id appreciate it if you give it a break.
In denial about what exactly? Ive said this in the past. Maybe it's coz I like the player and rate him, that it's easy to be misunderstood. I was pretty sure this was his last season here, at the start of it. I mean its only logical we make a step up in quality when your starters went from Vucinic-Gio to Tevez-Llorente. I feel the same way about Vuci and Gio who will have to movetwo progress with their careers.
Yes, I think he's contributed in his time here and he could've been useful in the months ahead. You have chosen to disagree. I believe I have a fair ability to reason/analyze this stuff. We don't have to agree, but I think some people mistake that I think he's a Maradona or a Pele. Some of my reasoning here is misunderstood. You mustve noticed that guys like me and ZoSo, Tommy etc, have usually only ever defended him more from insults and provocations than rational criticism (most of the time). You are free to judge that and/or laugh at it like some people here. And sure, I'm a fan of the player. That won't change after he leaves.
Shut up.
