Fabio Quagliarella (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
We really don't need 5 strikers if there are no long-term injuries, so I wouldn't be against the move if we parted with him, maybe Quag has a monster half-season (of which he's perfectly capable of) and gets a last minute ticket to Brazil. With Rossi out injured, Balotelli and Osvaldo having the season they're having and Totti being a big question mark, Prandelli should consider Quag as an impact player. But only if Lazio pay-up either now or in the summer.
Yea, I tend to agree with this. We shouldn't also forget the fact that are options to bring someone in our a but more limited, especially someone capable of being as impactful, while having to settle into a new environment, mid-season.
The Europa and Coppa are still to play for, and we'd be none the wiser if we held on to him IMO. I think we should retain Quag. No bias.
- - - Updated - - -
If he moves in the summer, I think he'll move abroad. New York, Totenham and the likes. Although, I still think his situation is linked to Gio and Vucinic who are also on the sales list. Let's see how their deals play out.
The Europa and Coppa are still to play for, and we'd be none the wiser if we held on to him IMO. I think we should retain Quag. No bias.
- - - Updated - - -
If he moves in the summer, I think he'll move abroad. New York, Totenham and the likes. Although, I still think his situation is linked to Gio and Vucinic who are also on the sales list. Let's see how their deals play out.
OP
