Fabio Quagliarella (45 Viewers)

Would you keep Quagliarella?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe


Results are only viewable after voting.

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,382
I don't think so. Quag falls into Conte's system and for me is the best player to play alongside Vucinic. You can never say never but we're not even linked with strikers so I doubt we'd sell one.
We are not linked with any forward because right now we have:

Del Piero, Vucinic, Matri, Quagliarella, Toni, Iaquinta and Amauri. And guess what, neither Iaquinta nor Amauri will leave and no one will buy them where as Quagliarella has no bound to the club and many clubs would actually take him. And we will not stay with 7 forwards.
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
Marotta had a deal with Fiorentina for Vargas apparently, straight swap. Quag for Vargas, Conte said no to both and declares Quag stays.
It seems perfectly believable that Marotta would try and act without Conte's approval, but it's good that our coach seems to have found an agreement to not let the ds do anything he pleases in transfers.
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
We are not linked with any forward because right now we have:

Del Piero, Vucinic, Matri, Quagliarella, Toni, Iaquinta and Amauri. And guess what, neither Iaquinta nor Amauri will leave and no one will buy them where as Quagliarella has no bound to the club and many clubs would actually take him. And we will not stay with 7 forwards.
I personally think it's ridiculous that there would be a chance of selling Quagliarella because Iaquinta and Amauri won't move. I really hope he'd reject it to piss off Marotta, actually, I firmly believe he has the ability to be an important player for the team.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
I personally think it's ridiculous that there would be a chance of selling Quagliarella because Iaquinta and Amauri won't move. I really hope he'd reject it to piss off Marotta, actually, I firmly believe he has the ability to be an important player for the team.
:like:
 

Fake Melo

Ghost Division
Sep 3, 2010
37,077
We are not linked with any forward because right now we have:

Del Piero, Vucinic, Matri, Quagliarella, Toni, Iaquinta and Amauri. And guess what, neither Iaquinta nor Amauri will leave and no one will buy them where as Quagliarella has no bound to the club and many clubs would actually take him. And we will not stay with 7 forwards.
Amauri will leave.
 

Fake Melo

Ghost Division
Sep 3, 2010
37,077
Even if Amauri leaves, Iaquinta won't which makes Quagliarella's leave very likely.
This :gsol: Injury :gsol: could not come on a better time :howler:

I hope we terminate his shitty contract already, pay him whatever he wants and let him fock off, clearly no clubs would want to pay money for him.

It'll be a huge mistake if Quagliarella gets sold.
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,942
Why sell Quagliarella because Iaquinta is perennially injured?
Because right now we have seven players (six even if Amauri is sold) up front. We're spending a massive amount of wages on players who won't get any playing time and since nobody will buy Toni and now nobody will buy and injured Yak either, they probably have to sell someone up front and Quagliarella is next in the pecking order.
 

Mike-e-y

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2004
11,188
I'd hate to see Quag sold, I think if we play a 4-3-3 he is ideally suited and Conte would be a fool to let him go, Quags and Vucinic supporting Matri would be pretty sweek. I'd like to see us bin off the ridiculousness of Toni and Amauri. That alone would mean Quags would stay
 
May 22, 2007
37,256
Because right now we have seven players (six even if Amauri is sold) up front. We're spending a massive amount of wages on players who won't get any playing time and since nobody will buy Toni and now nobody will buy and injured Yak either, they probably have to sell someone up front and Quagliarella is next in the pecking order.
Would make a lot more sense to give Iaquinta away for dirt cheap instead. I can't imagine the incompetence of selling one of Juventus' better players because of the inconvenience of others.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 45)