Fabio Paratici (30 Viewers)
- Thread starter Wahdan
- Start date
- Tags < secco beppe made in china bring back beppe poor man's beppe rus bangs hookers same as fr3sh being in charge
CR7's arrival is a good catalyst to figure out of whether the manager such as Paratici or Marotta is up to the task of taking the club to the whole new level.
If you can use CR7 as an asset to build a formidable super-power where CR7 is the shining diamond on its crown, then you're in the right place at the right time. But if CR7 is a liability for you, then the door is right there.
Apparently, if Beppe was indeed against CR7's signing because such a move would hinder his strategy for years to come, it was the right thing to do to let him go if the management had a better replacement in mind. But parting ways with Marotta just to give a helm to Paratici was a very questionable move, to put it mildly, if this "new" guy didn't have convincing answers to all the questions that bothered Beppe.
If having CR7 on a balance means that the new manager will focus on haphazard deals to simply balance the books, then bringing CR7 was just a waste of everyone's time, especially CR7's.
If Paratici is not very good at managing such a club but at the same time is doing a great job in terms of accounting and bookkeeping, he should probably just go to work in a bank. I believe, his new old chain-smoking friend will write him a great recommendation to his former employer.
If you can use CR7 as an asset to build a formidable super-power where CR7 is the shining diamond on its crown, then you're in the right place at the right time. But if CR7 is a liability for you, then the door is right there.
Apparently, if Beppe was indeed against CR7's signing because such a move would hinder his strategy for years to come, it was the right thing to do to let him go if the management had a better replacement in mind. But parting ways with Marotta just to give a helm to Paratici was a very questionable move, to put it mildly, if this "new" guy didn't have convincing answers to all the questions that bothered Beppe.
If having CR7 on a balance means that the new manager will focus on haphazard deals to simply balance the books, then bringing CR7 was just a waste of everyone's time, especially CR7's.
If Paratici is not very good at managing such a club but at the same time is doing a great job in terms of accounting and bookkeeping, he should probably just go to work in a bank. I believe, his new old chain-smoking friend will write him a great recommendation to his former employer.
For a club with such a bloated roster, in capable hands sales can be the main source of short-term financial leverage to transform quantity into concentrated quality. Bringing CR7 apparently was mainly a key part of a big and ambitious short-term strategy, which, if backed with stellar results right here and right now (i.e. CL triumph, treble, etc.), would have led to the long-term sustainable strategy on a new level. But the first task was definitely a short-term one.
If you made the first step, make the following steps as well, otherwise all of it makes no sense. Sell effectively, find additional outside financing, etc. Complete the picture you started drawing when the signatures on CR7's contract were put. Or don't waste anyone's time (and money, by the way).
If you made the first step, make the following steps as well, otherwise all of it makes no sense. Sell effectively, find additional outside financing, etc. Complete the picture you started drawing when the signatures on CR7's contract were put. Or don't waste anyone's time (and money, by the way).
Money is and will always going to be a problem when we play in backwards seria A.
Real barfa man utd pool bayern have almost double the revenue . The rest have sugar daddy's.
People seem to easily forget that we are only the 11th club revenue wise .
The cr7 deal was done primarily because of our try to increase our revenue and that strategy actually worked since we probably increased our revenue by 150 million??? since then covid hit and we are back to 2018.
2014 2015 juve could not even afford him even if he wanted to come then.
- - - Updated - - -
We have . We just don't play with one or took too long to integrate one. Now he is injured and since then we look like shi*t.
Ask pirlo.
Real barfa man utd pool bayern have almost double the revenue . The rest have sugar daddy's.
People seem to easily forget that we are only the 11th club revenue wise .
The cr7 deal was done primarily because of our try to increase our revenue and that strategy actually worked since we probably increased our revenue by 150 million??? since then covid hit and we are back to 2018.
2014 2015 juve could not even afford him even if he wanted to come then.
- - - Updated - - -
We have . We just don't play with one or took too long to integrate one. Now he is injured and since then we look like shi*t.
Ask pirlo.
If they increased revenue by 150 mil, but spend ~100 mil per year on CR7, and also broke the entire sporting strategy for years in favor of the short-term business goal, then it doesn't look like a well-planned strategy for a football club, especially in the long run.
Once CR7 leaves the club, the revenue trend pushed by his presence will inevitably take the opposite direction (we already saw the effect the mere rumors of his possible departure have on the club stock price). If the club doesn't get huge international success with CR7, eventually revenue may shrink even more than it used to in the pre-CR7 era. Add to this the reputation of CL losers that failed to win the tournament even with its biggest star ever in the squad, and the final result of this entire story looks terrible, from both sporting and business perspectives.
All of it makes some sense only if the strategy was to get CR7 to minimize the revenue gap for several years, and then jump to the Super League, completely erasing the CL narrative and starting with a clean slate. It does look quite plausible, since the CL obsession weirdly seems to be gone indeed. Not sure that CR7 subscribed to his role in this sly plan though.
Once CR7 leaves the club, the revenue trend pushed by his presence will inevitably take the opposite direction (we already saw the effect the mere rumors of his possible departure have on the club stock price). If the club doesn't get huge international success with CR7, eventually revenue may shrink even more than it used to in the pre-CR7 era. Add to this the reputation of CL losers that failed to win the tournament even with its biggest star ever in the squad, and the final result of this entire story looks terrible, from both sporting and business perspectives.
All of it makes some sense only if the strategy was to get CR7 to minimize the revenue gap for several years, and then jump to the Super League, completely erasing the CL narrative and starting with a clean slate. It does look quite plausible, since the CL obsession weirdly seems to be gone indeed. Not sure that CR7 subscribed to his role in this sly plan though.