Explosions in London ! (21 Viewers)

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by Yezkimov ] ++


You can't, you might break him, then his umbrella wouldn't work correctly.

Dual account!!!

++ [ originally posted by Azzurri7 ] ++


Nah, It's Actually called "Indignation".

Indignation is not without reason.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Azzurri7]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++



Osama's Al Quaeda just started the wave of terrorist attacks, but after 9/11 they were broken up.

Today, Al Quaeda is no longer a terrorist group per se, but rather and idea that various terrorist cells claim as their own, even if they have no direct link to Osama. The cells are organised in such a way that they can work completely indemepndant from one another, and from the "central command", and it wouldnt be surprising if Osama knew nothing of todays attacks, altho I can not say anything for sure.

Osama could be actually helping "Financial" or by Sending weapons, though we can be sure. But one thing am Sure of is that they are all like a Rop, related together, If the United States were able to catch Bin-Lande(whcih I doubt it) then they would be pulling the Rope out. He could be the key of Stopin Terror.

 

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by Azzurri7 ] ++


Osama could be actually helping "Financial" or by Sending weapons, though we can be sure. But one thing am Sure of is that they are all like a Rop, related together, If the United States were able to catch Bin-Lande(whcih I doubt it) then they would be pulling the Rope out. He could be the key of Stopin Terror.

Catching Osama will stop nothing. Terrorism can not be stopped unless the reasons for it's existance are erradicated.

 

[Azzurri7]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++




Indignation is not without reason.

Could be "Financial Interest" or could be "Common Joint" and this is not a real Reason IMO.

 

[Yezkimov]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++



Dual account!!!

Not exactly, it is my only account.

Well, I am not being a douche bag, so if my other account was UN-BANNED, I would gladdly take that over and not be a cock face.

 

[Dan]

:LOL:

 

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by Azzurri7 ] ++


Could be "Financial Interest" or could be "Common Joint" and this is not a real Reason IMO.

Common joint? What does that mean?


And what exactly financial interests would Osama for example have for attacking civilian targets?


All I want to say is that, contrary to popular belief, terrorists don't attack simply because they hate freedom and democracy or for no reason.

 

[Geof]

++ [ originally posted by Yezkimov ] ++
Not exactly, it is my only account.

Well, I am not being a douche bag, so if my other account was UN-BANNED, I would gladdly take that over and not be a cock face.

but it's not like your other account was banned without reasons.

 

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by Yezkimov ] ++


Not exactly, it is my only account.

Well, I am not being a douche bag, so if my other account was UN-BANNED, I would gladdly take that over and not be a cock face.

Well, if one of your accounts is banned that means you shouldn't even be here Burke

 

[Yezkimov]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++



All I want to say is that, contrary to popular belief, terrorists don't attack simply because they hate freedom and democracy or for no reason.

No, there obviously is a reason behind it all, but I think it is to strike TERROR in the hearts of those whom they deem as weak or some bullscheiße.

 

[Azzurri7]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++



Catching Osama will stop nothing. Terrorism can not be stopped unless the reasons for it's existance are erradicated.

Catchin Osama could be a Threat to any(Party,Organization or Qaeda and Al-Jihad etc). So Ofcoarse It'll Improve the situation or atleast decrease the "Terrorism". Thats a good Step If you ask me.

 

[Dan]

++ [ originally posted by Azzurri7 ] ++


Catchin Osama could be a Threat to any(Party,Organization or Qaeda and Al-Jihad etc). So Ofcoarse It'll Improve the situation or atleast decrease the "Terrorism". Thats a good Step If you ask me.

actually, catching Osama could increase it- how would the terrorists react to such an important figure being caught?

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by Dan ] ++


actually, catching Osama could increase it- how would the terrorists react to such an important figure being caught?

True, it is part of the build up that is going on in the world at the moment.

 

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by Azzurri7 ] ++


Catchin Osama could be a Threat to any(Party,Organization or Qaeda and Al-Jihad etc). So Ofcoarse It'll Improve the situation or atleast decrease the "Terrorism". Thats a good Step If you ask me.

TBH, I seriously doubt it. Like I said, these terrorist cells are largely independant and hence it's harder to stop them. Besides, there's a larger chance that terrorist attacks woul increas in retaliation for Osama's capture.

People thought that Arafat's death would help the peace process in Palesitne, but we all see how thats working out.

 

[Yezkimov]

I do not think it would escalate it, it is like catching a general in the army, the souldiers would have no leader, but they are stupid, so watch out for that.

I don't know what my point was supposed to be.

 

[Yezkimov]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++

People thought that Arafat's death would help the peace process in Palesitne, but we all see how thats working out.

We need Yasser back.

And Benjamin NettanYAHOOOOOOOOOOOO!

 

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by Yezkimov ] ++
I do not think it would escalate it, it is like catching a general in the army, the souldiers would have no leader, but they are stupid, so watch out for that.

I don't know what my point was supposed to be.

But the point here is that the soldiers dont need a leader, they act independantly.

 

[Azzurri7]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++



Common joint? What does that mean?


And what exactly financial interests would Osama for example have for attacking civilian targets?


All I want to say is that, contrary to popular belief, terrorists don't attack simply because they hate freedom and democracy or for no reason.

I wasn't taking about Osama, I was giving Example here.

Common Joint like Common Subscriber or more like share.

 

[Dan]

++ [ originally posted by Yezkimov ] ++
I do not think it would escalate it, it is like catching a general in the army, the souldiers would have no leader, but they are stupid, so watch out for that.

I don't know what my point was supposed to be.

the feeling is mutual

 

[Yezkimov]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++



But the point here is that the soldiers dont need a leader, they act independantly.

I agree to a point, but I still think order must be there in order for the terror to transfer down.