I just put the first name that came up. I didn't even watch his youtube vid. Maybe once when first linked. 
Seemed slow as hell if I remember correctly.
Seemed slow as hell if I remember correctly.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Endless Summer Mercato 2016 (114 Viewers)
- Thread starter JuveJay
- Start date
- Status
Buy on AliExpress.com
I just put the first name that came up. I didn't even watch his youtube vid. Maybe once when first linked.
Seemed slow as hell if I remember correctly.
Seemed slow as hell if I remember correctly.
I was reading more into his career. He was chosen best player of the competition in that Mickey Mouse clubs world cup.
http://globoesporte.globo.com/futeb...ereira-e-eleito-craque-do-mundial-sub-17.html
I was reading more into his career. He was chosen best player of the competition in that Mickey Mouse clubs world cup.
I was reading more into his career. He was chosen best player of the competition in that Mickey Mouse clubs world cup.
It's just like the regular FIFA clubs World Cup juts not funded or organized by FIFA and it happens in Spain. Teams from all the continents. But it's always SA against Europe on the last rounds.
Our under-17 Juventus team finished 3rd place in 2006 in that same year Jovetic was elected best player of the competition 
- - - Updated - - -
And I just read Roma has been permanently banned from the competition for racism towards some kid from the other team.
@Bianconero_Aus @Hustini
- - - Updated - - -
This year's competition
Our under-17 Juventus team finished 3rd place in 2006
in that same year Jovetic was elected best player of the competition - - - Updated - - -
And I just read Roma has been permanently banned from the competition for racism towards some kid from the other team.
@Bianconero_Aus @Hustini- - - Updated - - -
This year's competition
) or Crotone who just made it to Serie A
Isco's performance doesn't dip in big games. You don't know what you're talking about. Last big game he played was vs City, and he was one of the only four players on the pitch who did well.
Ozil completely disappears in any competitive game every single time.
No, he isn't. You can argue who's better. There's a wrong opinion there, but it's fine unless one says Ozil is "head and shoulders above" Isco. If you do that, then you're overrating Ozil and underrating Isco (aka being wrong about both players), and being silly like when you compared Saponara with Isco, lol.
BS rumor obviously. They're linking us with Kramer and other random players who can play the holding role because Marchisio is injured.
Any CM we buy should at least compete with Khedira.
He isn't worth more than 40m.
Soz, but it's obvious that you don't know much about Ozil or Isco. Isco's form doesn't depend on whether it's a big game or small game. It depends on what patch of form he's going through currently. And Ozil is the official flag-bearer of players who disappear in big games.
Preseason 2013 was when a direct comparison could be made. Isco was miles better, and Ozil was subsequently sold afterwards. Isco had a great start to that season before his form dropped slightly, and Di Maria, in his best-ever season, took over and gave the team more balance in a 3-man midfield. Ozil couldn't have done better than either of them in Ancelotti's more possession-based system just like how he has failed at Arsenal since then.
Whether he'll realize his full potential or not, I don't know, but at least Isco has the potential to be a top-10 player in the world. His weaknesses right now are not releasing the ball soon enough and going through patches of form. Only way he can get rid of those issues fast is if he plays regularly, but he has players like Modric, Kroos, Ronaldo and Bale ahead of him. He got more playing time last season, esp when Ancelotti was playing 442, and Isco was Real's 2nd-best player for a couple of months. Bale being off form last season definitely helped too.
It was clear even before Marotta said anything. James is on the chopping line, not Isco. Real doesn't want to sell, and Isco doesn't want to leave (even though he probably should). And we can pay 40m for a player now but not more than that.
Would be a bad signing for us even if he were affordable. We don't need any help in Serie A. We need players who can deliver in the CL knockouts. That's exactly what Ozil wouldn't do, and he'd slow our game down and make our midfield physically weaker on top of that.
- - - Updated - - -
Really not worth posting or discussing rumors from sources like that.
- - - Updated - - -
Nice. We've been linked with him since winter. Amazing deal for 2m if he turns out WC or a very good sub in the future. Will be a club HG player in 3 years.
Ozil completely disappears in any competitive game every single time.
No, he isn't. You can argue who's better. There's a wrong opinion there, but it's fine unless one says Ozil is "head and shoulders above" Isco. If you do that, then you're overrating Ozil and underrating Isco (aka being wrong about both players), and being silly like when you compared Saponara with Isco, lol.
BS rumor obviously. They're linking us with Kramer and other random players who can play the holding role because Marchisio is injured.
Any CM we buy should at least compete with Khedira.
He isn't worth more than 40m.
Soz, but it's obvious that you don't know much about Ozil or Isco. Isco's form doesn't depend on whether it's a big game or small game. It depends on what patch of form he's going through currently. And Ozil is the official flag-bearer of players who disappear in big games.
Preseason 2013 was when a direct comparison could be made. Isco was miles better, and Ozil was subsequently sold afterwards. Isco had a great start to that season before his form dropped slightly, and Di Maria, in his best-ever season, took over and gave the team more balance in a 3-man midfield. Ozil couldn't have done better than either of them in Ancelotti's more possession-based system just like how he has failed at Arsenal since then.
Whether he'll realize his full potential or not, I don't know, but at least Isco has the potential to be a top-10 player in the world. His weaknesses right now are not releasing the ball soon enough and going through patches of form. Only way he can get rid of those issues fast is if he plays regularly, but he has players like Modric, Kroos, Ronaldo and Bale ahead of him. He got more playing time last season, esp when Ancelotti was playing 442, and Isco was Real's 2nd-best player for a couple of months. Bale being off form last season definitely helped too.
It was clear even before Marotta said anything. James is on the chopping line, not Isco. Real doesn't want to sell, and Isco doesn't want to leave (even though he probably should). And we can pay 40m for a player now but not more than that.
Would be a bad signing for us even if he were affordable. We don't need any help in Serie A. We need players who can deliver in the CL knockouts. That's exactly what Ozil wouldn't do, and he'd slow our game down and make our midfield physically weaker on top of that.
- - - Updated - - -
Really not worth posting or discussing rumors from sources like that.
- - - Updated - - -
http://globoesporte.globo.com/futeb...ereira-e-eleito-craque-do-mundial-sub-17.html
I was reading more into his career. He was chosen best player of the competition in that Mickey Mouse clubs world cup.
I was reading more into his career. He was chosen best player of the competition in that Mickey Mouse clubs world cup.
It is how life works my friend. Consider it for yourself, let's say a colleague, who maybe is a little better but in the end does the same job as you, earns twice as much... I'd demand a raise immediately, not twice as much but still a raise. It simply works that way. And of course many players are unrechable for us; money talks.
Excellent posts by @italiacalcio10. Can't rep coz must spread.
@Valerio, revenue can't be negative. Maybe you're confusing rev with net income.
Revenue is just what you earn. That's the first thing you list on an income statement. Revenue doesn't account for costs. Revenue itself doesn't tell you how healthy the club is or what the club's spending power is.
Profit (revenue minus cost) tells you more than revenue. EBITDA tells you even more. And you also have to look at some ratios to get a general idea.
Forbes published a list top-10 or top-20 clubs based on EBITDA. It was posted in the finances thread. Bayern's spending power is similar to ours now, not like Real's. And I didn't mention Barca because they don't have much to spend this summer because of the silly high bonuses they've to pay their players. (That's one of the reasons that rules out Pogba leaving this summer.)
Our debt to EBITDA ratio and debt to revenue ratio are fine. You want some debt. Having debt means you're investing, which you should be doing. If you don't have any debt, it means you don't know what the hell you're doing.
Bayern not having any debt doesn't make any sense to me. But since they're paying interest, they're obviously "hiding" debt. They're doing so because they don't want to disclose their investments.
@Valerio, revenue can't be negative. Maybe you're confusing rev with net income.
Revenue is just what you earn. That's the first thing you list on an income statement. Revenue doesn't account for costs. Revenue itself doesn't tell you how healthy the club is or what the club's spending power is.
Profit (revenue minus cost) tells you more than revenue. EBITDA tells you even more. And you also have to look at some ratios to get a general idea.
Forbes published a list top-10 or top-20 clubs based on EBITDA. It was posted in the finances thread. Bayern's spending power is similar to ours now, not like Real's. And I didn't mention Barca because they don't have much to spend this summer because of the silly high bonuses they've to pay their players. (That's one of the reasons that rules out Pogba leaving this summer.)
Our debt to EBITDA ratio and debt to revenue ratio are fine. You want some debt. Having debt means you're investing, which you should be doing. If you don't have any debt, it means you don't know what the hell you're doing.
Bayern not having any debt doesn't make any sense to me. But since they're paying interest, they're obviously "hiding" debt. They're doing so because they don't want to disclose their investments.
- Status