[EN] Premier League 2004/05 (12 Viewers)

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
Frankly, it might be "naive" football, but here in the UK, we "like" attacking/positive football...Like you said Facts are facts, Chelsea scored something like 1.2 goals a game without Robben, it then went to 2.7 with Robben...Chelsea - Robben = Boring... Mourinho - Abramovich's money = Nothing...Mourinho = Overrated...Mourinho's success at Porto = Something I dont rate highly...
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

vedder

Junior Member
Jun 18, 2003
159
"Mourinho - Abramovich's money = Nothing...Mourinho = Overrated...Mourinho's success at Porto = Something I dont rate highly..."

how can anyone can take you seriously with statements like these...........

winning a CL with a minor budget is something to forget......

that because of these remarks that i say:

jose mourinho
he wins all things
he´s the master
THE KING OF KINGS
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
++ [ originally posted by vedder ] ++
"Mourinho - Abramovich's money = Nothing...Mourinho = Overrated...Mourinho's success at Porto = Something I dont rate highly..."

how can anyone can take you seriously with statements like these...........

winning a CL with a minor budget is something to forget......

that because of these remarks that i say:

jose mourinho
he wins all things
he´s the master
THE KING OF KINGS
Like I have said, it is important to me personally about the WAY someone wins something as well, and Mourinho's teams, "antics" were disgraceful, and to think that he ACTUALLY was praised for it is a joke!
 

vedder

Junior Member
Jun 18, 2003
159
mourinho teams are not desgraceful, what was desgraceful was united against milan. with a better squad than chelsea, in terms of quantity, they are lacking results..........
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
++ [ originally posted by vedder ] ++
mourinho teams are not desgraceful, what was desgraceful was united against milan. with a better squad than chelsea, in terms of quantity, they are lacking results..........
What do you expect, when one of there most important players had just returned from a 4 month injury, and having a "problem" with our goalkeeper? Frankly, regardless of people saying wishing the past to be different is stupid, (it is), had Ruud not of gotten injured (and if Rio hadnt wrongfully been banned) then United would of won the league last season, and be top this season...Regardless of anything Mourinho could do...
 

vedder

Junior Member
Jun 18, 2003
159
ahah
if i had weels i´ll be a truck............

chelsea without robben and drogba won barça!!!!

when you have rooney, smith, saha...................
carvalho was away several games and the defence was even better...........

trust me on this if:
if mourinho was your manager united would won the treble......
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
++ [ originally posted by vedder ] ++
ahah
if i had weels i´ll be a truck............

chelsea without robben and drogba won barça!!!!

when you have rooney, smith, saha...................
carvalho was away several games and the defence was even better...........

trust me on this if:
if mourinho was your manager united would won the treble......
We did win the Treble...

Drogba? That was a plus for Chelsea, who is Drogba? The Ivorian Emile Heskey? It mean they had to play Gudjohnsen, who is 10 times better...

Ruud van Nistelrooy = 4 month injury...14 goals this season...8 in 4 games in Europe...

Drogba...9 goals this season...
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
Your right, but regardless a team still need some "super" players...

Milan: Shevchenko...Kaka...Pirlo...Gattuso...etc etc etc...at good as a team, but still have amazing individual skill...that can win games...

Every teams has/needs them...Look at Everton in England, they are completely a "team" no "stars", but thats is why they are "4th" they have no "special" players...although I think Cahill is very good...
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
Yeah, but there are no players like that at United, no egos...But van Nistelrooy is the No.1 striker at United, same as Sheva at Milan, Adriano at Inter etc etc...
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
Well, so you know I think he is very good, currently better IMHO then Lampard...scored more goals...no offense intented, but I have never really though Australians were good at football, for example Harry "The overpaid joke" Kewell, glad to be proven wrong...(those very rare occasions...)
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
++ [ originally posted by Nicole ] ++
Well, so you know I think he is very good, currently better IMHO then Lampard...scored more goals...no offense intented, but I have never really though Australians were good at football, for example Harry "The overpaid joke" Kewell, glad to be proven wrong...(those very rare occasions...)
Kewell's one of the most naturally gifted players I've had the pleasure of watching. It's just that he's an injury-prone waster.
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
Thats his problem, he is living on past glory...He hasnt done anything since being at Liverpool, despite draining 1/4 of a Million every month out of the club...
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
++ [ originally posted by Nicole ] ++
Thats his problem, he is living on past glory...He hasnt done anything since being at Liverpool, despite draining 1/4 of a Million every month out of the club...
Ah, I can't help but chuckle. Houllier really spoiled that club for me.
 

Nicole

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2004
7,561
Oh wait, you havent heard the best part...Kewell, in his contract ACTUALLY has it written that he can CHOOSE when to play and when NOT too...He has a "veto" on when he plays...

THen again I hate Liverpool...There is only one Harry Kewell!!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 12)