Edinson Cavani - ST- PSG (39 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
if we arent bringing back Berardi (which if we sign Dybala and another forward like Cavani/Falcao/whoever doesent seem to be the case) then what would we do. can we afford all the targets we want this summer if we spend 15M on a player we arent using next season? would it be better to buy and loan him out, or sell his half with a buyback option? would we agree to a 30M buyback (15M half > 30M full) and would Sassuolo accept a lower buyback like 20-25M after they spend 15M on his half? curious to see what will Marotta do

- - - Updated - - -

Am not fighting and not against cavani he is superb.

But juve will not spend 60m plus in the marceto
If we buy cavani and pereyra thats almost 60m
how do you know that for sure? our revenue is higher each year (so is our spending power), we cleared our debt (or we are close to, cant remember clearly), and we spent almost nothing last 2 mercatos. accoring to the names we are linked with (Dybala, Cavani, Witsel, Allan) we could have much more to spend than we are used to. but on the other hand could also be total bullshit by media so better not expecting too much either
 
Jan 5, 2007
4,066
if we arent bringing back Berardi (which if we sign Dybala and another forward like Cavani/Falcao/whoever doesent seem to be the case) then what would we do. can we afford all the targets we want this summer if we spend 15M on a player we arent using next season? would it be better to buy and loan him out, or sell his half with a buyback option? would we agree to a 30M buyback (15M half > 30M full) and would Sassuolo accept a lower buyback like 20-25M after they spend 15M on his half? curious to see what will Marotta do

- - - Updated - - -



how do you know that for sure? our revenue is higher each year (so is our spending power), we cleared our debt (or we are close to, cant remember clearly), and we spent almost nothing last 2 mercatos. accoring to the names we are linked with (Dybala, Cavani, Witsel, Allan) we could have much more to spend than we are used to. but on the other hand could also be total bull$#@! by media so better not expecting too much either
I dont know like every one dont.

That my opinion, last year we spend around 25m so i cant expect more 40 to 50 at max the upcoming year.
 

blondu

Grazie Ale
Nov 9, 2006
27,408
if we arent bringing back Berardi (which if we sign Dybala and another forward like Cavani/Falcao/whoever doesent seem to be the case) then what would we do. can we afford all the targets we want this summer if we spend 15M on a player we arent using next season? would it be better to buy and loan him out, or sell his half with a buyback option? would we agree to a 30M buyback (15M half > 30M full) and would Sassuolo accept a lower buyback like 20-25M after they spend 15M on his half? curious to see what will Marotta do

- - - Updated - - -



how do you know that for sure? our revenue is higher each year (so is our spending power), we cleared our debt (or we are close to, cant remember clearly), and we spent almost nothing last 2 mercatos. accoring to the names we are linked with (Dybala, Cavani, Witsel, Allan) we could have much more to spend than we are used to. but on the other hand could also be total bullshit by media so better not expecting too much either
because pogba is strongly linked to an exit..
 

Pirlo's Beard

Junkie Joe Joyce
Oct 2, 2013
11,412
Only Cavani links were supposedly contingent on Pogba leaving. And even those recent links have nothing to do with Pogba.

Considering we've been penny pinching as of late and our revenue is about to surpass 300M I think it's very reasonable to expect a proper investment in the squad.
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,990
Whats so strange? It seems he is not in our sporting plans.

It would be so incredibly stupid of our management to offload Berardi. When was the last time their was a top Italian striker? This kid is 20 years old.

He scored 16 goals-6 assists last year.

He has 11 goals-8 assists this year.

That's insane for an 20 year old in any top league. His finishing is fantastic. His passing is brilliant. His big weakness is discipline, which can easily be worked on in a very disciplined top club like Juventus.

If we let him go, and he goes on to be the next great Italian forward/attacking winger for a team like Milan or Roma, there are no words for how stupid this would be, considering we can bring him back for a very reasonable fee, and if we really want to, loan him out to continue developing for another year.
Im not arguing against his quality. Of course i rate him a lot. But all is pointing that the board will go for a classic 10 (dybala) to continue our 4312 instead of having to move a lot of players and go for a 433 where berardi can fit. Berardi is not a 10 like Tevez who can put the workload, he is not a fantasista like dybala seems to be, and it seems he is not good enought to warrant a formation change to 433 and build the team around him. On top of that he is a card magnet.

Im all for bringing him back since he will be cheap in comparison with the likes of dyabala ,is italian and seems to have a good career in front of him given his numbers... but for the reasons mentioned.. i fear we will get rid of him. Sounds risky and borderline stupid...but it all depends on what marotta and allegri have in mind.

Stop fighting it, it will only hurt more when it happens.

We're getting Edison Cavaneeeeeeeeeeeee :tuttosport:
lets hope so. We need a real goalscorer.

Berardi can wait a year, we can organise some buy back dealio with Sassuolo. Let them use Coman next season to sweeten the deal.
Something on those lines. As long as Tevez is here.. i feel Berardi will not find space in our team, because we will not play 433 and put tevez on the wings. Also, i find tevez is not a classical CF ...and one of him or Morata would have to go to the wings to fit Berardi. Berardi as the main SS?=...just no.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Whats so strange? It seems he is not in our sporting plans.



Im not arguing against his quality. Of course i rate him a lot. But all is pointing that the board will go for a classic 10 (dybala) to continue our 4312 instead of having to move a lot of players and go for a 433 where berardi can fit. Berardi is not a 10 like Tevez who can put the workload, he is not a fantasista like dybala seems to be, and it seems he is not good enought to warrant a formation change to 433 and build the team around him. On top of that he is a card magnet.

Im all for bringing him back since he will be cheap in comparison with the likes of dyabala ,is italian and seems to have a good career in front of him given his numbers... but for the reasons mentioned.. i fear we will get rid of him. Sounds risky and borderline stupid...but it all depends on what marotta and allegri have in mind.



lets hope so. We need a real goalscorer.



Something on those lines. As long as Tevez is here.. i feel Berardi will not find space in our team, because we will not play 433 and put tevez on the wings. Also, i find tevez is not a classical CF ...and one of him or Morata would have to go to the wings to fit Berardi. Berardi as the main SS?=...just no.
I'm not advocating Berardi here next year... but Tevez is gone, for sure the year after. So 1 more season with Tevez. Than we have Morata potentially leaving for Madrid that same summer. If that happens we'll have 30 mil to replace him, so that wouldn't be the end of the world, even if keeping him would be ideal.

Berardi in my opinion should be bought, as it's only 15 mil. Total outlay on the player will be pretty low. His performance so far as U20 in Serie A is astonishing and it would be ridiculous not to buy him. And yes, I do rate the fact he is Italian, as this would be massive for Juve to have the next great Italian attacking talent. There hasn't been one since Del Piero and Totti (Giuseppe Rossi was the closest). That's a long time.

He should be loaned out next year and allowed to develop further. Any number of mid-table clubs would love to have him.

From watching him play these last two years, I think he could easily play SS, and be superb at it. His creativity is massively underrated, as is his passing. Look at his assist numbers. 6 last year, 8 already this year. That's excellent. I think he'd be versatile across the entire front-line aside from a traditional CF type. Good finishing, good passing, decent creativity. He'd borderline be able to play a no 10 role in the hole behind 2 strikers. It wouldn't be ideal of course. I'd love to see him here. Even if just as a rotational option, allowing us more tactical flexibility. With Coman, Berardi, Pepe, Pereyra all able to play on the wings, it would be very easy for us to rotate into a 4-3-3 for some matches.

Something like Coman--Morata/Dybala--Berardi might be incredible in 2-3 years time if we groom Coman and Berardi into these roles well. :tuttosport:
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,990
I'm not advocating Berardi here next year... but Tevez is gone, for sure the year after. So 1 more season with Tevez. Than we have Morata potentially leaving for Madrid that same summer. If that happens we'll have 30 mil to replace him, so that wouldn't be the end of the world, even if keeping him would be ideal.

Berardi in my opinion should be bought, as it's only 15 mil. Total outlay on the player will be pretty low. His performance so far as U20 in Serie A is astonishing and it would be ridiculous not to buy him. And yes, I do rate the fact he is Italian, as this would be massive for Juve to have the next great Italian attacking talent. There hasn't been one since Del Piero and Totti (Giuseppe Rossi was the closest). That's a long time.

He should be loaned out next year and allowed to develop further. Any number of mid-table clubs would love to have him.

From watching him play these last two years, I think he could easily play SS, and be superb at it. His creativity is massively underrated, as is his passing. Look at his assist numbers. 6 last year, 8 already this year. That's excellent. I think he'd be versatile across the entire front-line aside from a traditional CF type. Good finishing, good passing, decent creativity. He'd borderline be able to play a no 10 role in the hole behind 2 strikers. It wouldn't be ideal of course. I'd love to see him here. Even if just as a rotational option, allowing us more tactical flexibility. With Coman, Berardi, Pepe, Pereyra all able to play on the wings, it would be very easy for us to rotate into a 4-3-3 for some matches.

Something like Coman--Morata/Dybala--Berardi might be incredible in 2-3 years time if we groom Coman and Berardi into these roles well. :tuttosport:
Thats basically what i said. The issue here is that as cute as it sounds.. i dont see hints that allegri wants to 433. Next year tevez will be here and that means 4312...so at most he will have smoe time to play in the season after tevez leaves..NAD if we plan to play 433. I dont see him as a talented 10, so i dont think he will slot in the tevez role in a 4312
 

Stu

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
17,557
I dont know like every one dont.

That my opinion, last year we spend around 25m so i cant expect more 40 to 50 at max the upcoming year.
We will almost certainly spend more than 50m. Dybala and Pereyra alone will be like 45m and there's no way they will be our only signings. Even if it's just Zaza that's already more than 50m, and on top of that we've been linked with centre mids and should be looking at a full back as well. Hopefully we're able to recoup close to 20m on Llorente and Ogbonna because I could easily see us spending 70-80m this summer.
 
Jan 5, 2007
4,066
We will almost certainly spend more than 50m. Dybala and Pereyra alone will be like 45m and there's no way they will be our only signings. Even if it's just Zaza that's already more than 50m, and on top of that we've been linked with centre mids and should be looking at a full back as well. Hopefully we're able to recoup close to 20m on Llorente and Ogbonna because I could easily see us spending 70-80m this summer.
80 will be enough to buy dybala, pereyra and berardi. :D
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
80 will be enough to buy dybala, pereyra and berardi. :D
30 mil Dybala, 15 mil Pereyra, 15 mil Berardi, 20 mil Darmian

= 80 mil mercato

:tuttosport:

I said a couple weeks ago, I think we're in line for a 60-80 mil mercato, as we've had a zero net spend over the last two years total.

-15 this past year, and +18 the year before. So we're actually +3 on the transfers over the last 2 years.

With the increased revenue this year, I really see us spending big (relatively speaking).
 

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
30 mil Dybala, 15 mil Pereyra, 15 mil Berardi, 20 mil Darmian

= 80 mil mercato

:tuttosport:

I said a couple weeks ago, I think we're in line for a 60-80 mil mercato, as we've had a zero net spend over the last two years total.

-15 this past year, and +18 the year before. So we're actually +3 on the transfers over the last 2 years.

With the increased revenue this year, I really see us spending big (relatively speaking).
Shame on you for not including Cavani, especially since we are in his thread.
 
Apr 25, 2015
228
30 mil Dybala, 15 mil Pereyra, 15 mil Berardi, 20 mil Darmian

= 80 mil mercato

:tuttosport:

I said a couple weeks ago, I think we're in line for a 60-80 mil mercato, as we've had a zero net spend over the last two years total.

-15 this past year, and +18 the year before. So we're actually +3 on the transfers over the last 2 years.

With the increased revenue this year, I really see us spending big (relatively speaking).
Is dybala really that good?
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
yeah. Dybala 25M, Pereyra 14M, Allan loan + option, Darmian 13M (+bonuses :p), Kurzawa 13M, Cavani 30M

90M :tuttosport:

now, if we do the Zaza/Berardi (buyback included) exchange, and then send Zaza to Torino for Darmian, we could end up spending under 80M :tuttosport::tuttosport::tuttosport:
 

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
Bright future ahead, but we're better off without the Uruguayan.
Anybody with working internet can watch PSG matches and he is not the guy we knew.
In Napoli he has passed his prime already
Truth be told they did a great job loading Cavani off.
I doubt he is good enough for PSG let alone Juventus at this stage.
Not very likely for Beppe to drop $$$ on him.
Great Man will focus on rejuvenation with Dybala and co.

Praising his old days is nice and dandy but let's stay realistic.
Ibarbo would have been a transfer of similar quality for smaller money.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 34)