Edin Džeko - Striker - Manchester City - Part 2 (44 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703


Edin Dzeko sure is slow, lazy and not prolific. :howler:

Certainly not as good a finisher as Suarez or Cavani. Won't fit the system either. Can't finish, can't use his head, can't use his left foot...can barely finish with his right foot either.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

PiN7uRiCCHi0

Senior Member
Aug 18, 2010
926
Dzeko: 45 games, 16 goals
Suarez: 44 games, 15 goals.

How can you claim Suarez is so much better than Dzeko?
Better put it this way:

Suarez - 3256 minutes, 17 goals (37 starts), a goal every 192 minutes
Dzeko - 2394 minutes, 19 goals (26 starts), a goal every 126 minutes

Based on all club competitions this year.

However, not sure what exactly are you trying to prove with this.
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,177
:lol: :sergio: :wallbang: It's pointless to argue with the Hust. The man knows his shit. After all, if he says a player is a genius and the 2'nd coming of Maradona we all have to :delpiero:

Youtube? Seriously? Do you even watch the games, or just rely on what others tell you, and online youtube videos and the highlights package every once in a while? :rolleyes:

I actually said Dzeko is more prolific than Suarez; you just can't read :D

Moreover, I'm going to take the word of the few Bosnians here on this forum over your own biased nonsensical opinion. Sorry.
 

am0110

Senior Member
Jun 5, 2005
5,829
there is more, when Džeko sucks, he suck so much that you cant believe you paid him so much, but also when he shines it looks like he is Trezeguet.So pray to God that ratio of suckness is lower in one season.The guy can be so frustrating, almost like Borrielo_On the other hand he can play fantastically, soooo I would rather have someone who is consistent.
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,177
Don't argue with him. He doesn't watch the games. He relies on youtube, highlights packages, and WOM.

I actually watch Man City, because my best friend is a friggin City supporter :yuck: :inter:

As for his time in Germany and the Bundesliga, may I remind you that Diego, Pizzaro, Huntelaar, and Mario Gomez all beasted there. I don't want any of the latter three, and we all know what happened when we acquired the former.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
there is more, when Džeko sucks, he suck so much that you cant believe you paid him so much, but also when he shines it looks like he is Trezeguet.So pray to God that ratio of suckness is lower in one season.The guy can be so frustrating, almost like Borrielo_On the other hand he can play fantastically, soooo I would rather have someone who is consistent.
Same could be said for Trez. He went ghostly for an entire game then boom, scored a goal the save the game. All players can be frustrating man, but the guy can finish with the best of them. Lazy or not, slow or not, the guy scores...thats his job and thats exactly what we need.
Don't argue with him. He doesn't watch the games. He relies on youtube, highlights packages, and WOM.

I actually watch Man City, because my best friend is a friggin City supporter :yuck: :inter:

As for his time in Germany and the Bundesliga, may I remind you that Diego, Pizzaro, Huntelaar, and Mario Gomez all beasted there. I don't want any of the latter three, and we all know what happened when we acquired the former.
Yes, I have never seen Dzeko play a single game in my life. Thank God for youtube to bail me out.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
Drogba + Suarez vs Dzeko + Kalou/Farfan/Kuyt

Please Discuss.
Why would anyone even discuss that?

However, expand that a little bit more.

Drogba and Suarez, with their resepctive salaries/transfer fees, would cost sigtnificantly more than a combination of Dzeko + the free agents that you mentioned.

With that money being saved on the transfer fee alone, the money could be better used on a Gaston ramirez.

Therefore, you could theoretically make a comparison of Drogba + Suarez vs. Dzeko + Ramirez and as you can see..................



Damn. The first column is still better. But you get my point though. That would be a bigger dog to bring to the fight than the examples that you had used.
 

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,177
Why would anyone even discuss that?

However, expand that a little bit more.

Drogba and Suarez, with their resepctive salaries/transfer fees, would cost sigtnificantly more than a combination of Dzeko + the free agents that you mentioned.

With that money being saved on the transfer fee alone, the money could be better used on a Gaston ramirez.

Therefore, you could theoretically make a comparison of Drogba + Suarez vs. Dzeko + Ramirez and as you can see..................



Damn. The first column is still better. But you get my point though. That would be a bigger dog to bring to the fight than the examples that you had used.
I was trying to be more realistic, as I haven't heard Ramirez's name being mentioned for a while now. As you rightly stated, the inclusion of Ramirez instead of those 3 has beens makes it more intriguing, but the Drogba + Suarez combo is still superior :stuckup:

We can then go for Cavani/Higuain next season ;)

How about Giroud + Suarez vs Dzeko + Ramirez
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
I was trying to be more realistic, as I haven't heard Ramirez's name being mentioned for a while now. As you rightly stated, the inclusion of Ramirez instead of those 3 has beens makes it more intriguing, but the Drogba + Suarez combo is still superior :stuckup:

We can then go for Cavani/Higuain next season ;)

How about Giroud + Suarez vs Dzeko + Ramirez
I don't know. I don't know anything about Giroud, which is why I haven't really commented on him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 39)